Laserfiche WebLink
have been times when Attorney Clem has appeared before the Board <br />representing various clients when he has voted against him because <br />he didn't agree with that position as a Commissioner. Politically, <br />it probably would be wise to sit here and vote against him today <br />because of the innuendo and the politics of it. However, he <br />believed in his heart that the proper thing to do is allow them to <br />continue to serve in their capacity. That is his position. <br />Chairman Eggert was struggling over this matter, and while she <br />could not imagine Attorney Clem or Attorney Vocelle doing something <br />that is adverse to the County or doing something that is a conflict <br />of interest, she does see where Attorney Reynolds is coming from. <br />Commissioner Bowman felt that if there is the slightest <br />appearance of a conflict, especially in the eyes of the public, we <br />should not allow it to continue. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowman, the Board voted 3-2, Commissioners <br />Bird and Wheeler dissenting, to accept Attorney Reynold's <br />recommendation to deny consent for the law firm of Clem, <br />Polackwich & Vocelle to continue representation of Prince <br />Contracting Company, Inc. <br />FAMILY DAY CARE REGULATIONS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 3/5/92: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />FROM: Carolyn R. Eggert, Chairman CA <br />RE: Family Day Care Regulations <br />DATE: March 5, 1992 <br />The attached is a letter from Dr. Donna Skinner <br />about the new voucher system to begin October 1st, and the <br />possible lack of regulations in family day care homes. <br />Do you wish staff to investigate ordinances from <br />Palm Beach, Broward and Pinellas on this matter with a <br />thought toward investigating some Indian River County <br />regulations? <br />53 <br />RUGS. Frr�F. b <br />o <br />