My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/24/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
3/24/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:20:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/24/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM - PHASE I <br />The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry <br />Pinto dated March 16, 1992: <br />DATE: MARCH 16, 1992 <br />TO: JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />DIRECTOR -OF UTILI' <br />STAFFED AND <br />PREPARED BY: H. D. �OSTER,, P.E. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: NORTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM - PHASE I <br />IRC PROJECT NO. UW -90 -05 -DS <br />BACKGROUND: <br />During its design and accompanying survey, it was determined that <br />certain easements would be required for construction of the subject <br />project. During the time of easement acquisition, a water system <br />analysis, which recommended revised line sizes, was completed. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />The Department was advised that easements were not going to be received <br />by the County, and Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. (PBS&J) was <br />directed to delete a certain portion of the water line from the project <br />and .expended man-hours in the process.. Later, the easement was <br />unexpectedly received, and PBS&J was instructed to reinstate that <br />portion that had been deleted. <br />PBS&J was then directed to revise the plans in accordance with the <br />recommended downsizing in the North County Water System Preliminary <br />Analysis. Costs incurred are as follows: <br />Project Manager: <br />$30/hr. <br />rate X 3 multiplier = <br />$90/hr'. X 5 hrs. <br />_ $ 450 <br />Senior Manager: <br />$25/hr. <br />rate X 3 multiplier = <br />$75/hr. X 9 hrs. <br />= 675 <br />Designer: <br />$15/hr. <br />rate X 3 multiplier = <br />$45/hr. X 24 hrs. <br />= 1 080 <br />Clerical: <br />$12/hr. <br />rate X 3 multiplier = <br />$36/hr. X 4 hrs. <br />_ X144 <br />Subtotal: <br />$2,349 <br />Directs: <br />GADD <br />Printing <br />$ 105 <br />100 <br />Subtotal: <br />205 <br />TOTAL: $2,554 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />The staff of the Department of Utility Services recommends approval of <br />the above expenditure and accompanying increased fee of $2,554 for <br />additional services. <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.