My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/24/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
3/24/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:20:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/24/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�ooK f�{.,E� <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, to approve the expenditure of <br />$2,554 for additional services from Post, Buckley, <br />Schuh & Jernigan on the North County Water System, <br />Phase I, as recommended by staff. <br />County Attorney Vitunac addressed the following question to <br />Commissioner Scurlock: Would any past or present relationship with <br />Post Buckley Schuh & Jernigan cause you to have a conflict of <br />interest on this vote. <br />Commissioner Scurlock answered in the negative and inquired if <br />the question would be asked of each Commissioner. <br />Attorney Vitunac explained that he had heard rumors only <br />about Commissioner Scurlock. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if any Commissioner had a conflict of <br />interest regarding the North County Water System, Phase I. <br />Commissioner Scurlock commented that he was getting a little <br />tired of that. <br />Attorney Vitunac further explained that he was hearing by way <br />of the newspaper and depositions that when there were rumors <br />previously regarding the Guettler issue, Commissioner Scurlock <br />criticized the Commission and County Attorney for sitting mute and <br />not asking the question, and now he was asking the question. If <br />the Board so wished, he would not ask the question in the future. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously.. <br />AGREEMENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF OVERSIZING WATER MAIN <br />The Board reviewed memo from Utility Services Director Terry <br />Pinto dated March 16, 1992: <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.