My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/14/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
4/14/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/14/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />in the community and they have formulated a plan to present to the <br />Commission and to the various local governments within the county. <br />The proposed workshop is a format which has been successfully <br />completed in a number of other communities including Tallahassee, <br />Jacksonville and Culver City, California. In West Palm Beach,a <br />workshop resulted in a report which led to a change in their form <br />of city government. The workshop which the committee is asking to <br />be funded is a process for dialogue. It is not to set an agenda <br />nor to discuss particular issues. It is to recognize that there <br />are general areas of community interest on which honorable people <br />disagree and this workshop is a vehicle that can be put in place to <br />have those people meet for open dialogue to discuss those issues <br />without the pressures of trying to address a particular bill or a <br />particular opinion. It is a process to find out where the <br />disagreeing parties may reach a consensus on a number of issues <br />which are important to the County. <br />In addition to financial support Mr. Wetzig requested that the <br />Board add their personal involvement in two ways: first, to have <br />someone be a liaison with the steering committee and, secondly, but <br />more important in the long run, each Commissioner spend some time <br />at the two-day workshop to observe, to move around among the <br />different working groups and hear the different discussions and <br />listen and glean personally from the process, and in that way be <br />able to determine whether the process makes sense to do again. <br />These processes, once started, do repeat because they raise issues <br />that participants want to talk about "next year." <br />The budget itself has been constructed to allow for a number <br />of issues. The amount budgeted for the professional facilitator is <br />an outside number. We sent formal requests for written proposals <br />to three professional facilitators and two responded. One was <br />substantially higher, that is, $30,000 to $40,000 higher and really <br />wanted to change the entire process from a community meeting and <br />get together into a questionnaire and a totally different kind of <br />format. The budgeted amount is consistent with what a facilitator <br />has cost in other communities. The professional fee for the <br />facilitator, as with most consultants, is a $1,000 a day. That <br />does not include time that is spent in preparation but does include <br />those days when the facilitator physically comes here plus the <br />preparation of the final report, so this is an outside budget <br />number. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked if the steering committee <br />anticipates future workshops each year or two, and Mr. Wetzig <br />responded that in his experience once a community has gone through <br />these workshops they have found enough value in it to want to do it <br />29 <br />ARR 41992 3or� 61�F,t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.