My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/28/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
4/28/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:54:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />In this section, <br />application will <br />description of: <br />an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />be presented. The analysis will include a <br />C concurrency of public facilities <br />C compatibility with the surrounding area <br />C consistency with the comprehensive plan <br />C potential impact on environmental quality <br />This section will also cons ider.alternatives for development of the <br />site. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the County Urban Service Area (USA), an <br />area deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive <br />plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be <br />reviewed to ensure that the minimum level of service standards for <br />these services and facilities are maintained. For rezoning <br />requests, this review is undertaken as part of the conditional <br />concurrency application process. <br />A per Section 910.07 of the County's Land Development Regulations, <br />conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects, county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning district or land <br />use designation. For residential rezoning requests, the most <br />intense use (according to the county's LDR's) is the maximum number <br />of units that could be built on the site, given the size of the <br />Property and the maximum density under the proposed zoning <br />district. The site information used for the concurrency analysis <br />is as follows: <br />1. <br />Size of <br />Property: ±35.6 acres <br />2• <br />Size of <br />Area to be Rezoned: ±35.6 <br />acres <br />3. <br />Existing <br />Zoning Classification: <br />RS -3, Single -Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 3 units/acre) <br />4. <br />Existing <br />Land Use Designation: <br />L- 1, Low -Density <br />Residential - 1 (up to 3 <br />units/acre) <br />5. <br />Proposed <br />Zoning Classification: <br />A -1 Agricultural <br />District (up to 1 unit/5 <br />acres) <br />6• Maximum Number pf Units with Proposed Zoning: ±7 units <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency <br />review because the requested agricultural zoning would decrease the <br />total number of potential units that the site could accommodate <br />from 106 units to 7 units. <br />17 <br />�' <br />APS 2 1992 �;� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.