My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/28/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
4/28/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:54:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/28/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description of: <br />o concurrency of public facilities <br />o compatibility with the surrounding area <br />o consistency with the comprehensive plan <br />o potential impact on environmental quality <br />This section will also consider alternatives for development of the <br />site. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />The site is located within the county Urban Service Area (USA), an <br />area deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive <br />Plan establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan also requires that new development be <br />reviewed to ensure that the minimum adopted level of "service <br />standards for these services and facilities are maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For comprehensive plan amendments and rezoning requests, <br />conditional concurrency review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since <br />comprehensive plan amendments and rezoning requests are not <br />projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be <br />based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon <br />the requested zoning district or land use designation. For <br />residential rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to <br />the county's LDR's) is the maximum number of units that could be <br />built on the site, given the size of the property and the maximum <br />density under the proposed zoning district. The site information <br />used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Property: #4.8 acres <br />2. Size of Area to be Rezoned: t4.8 acres <br />3. Existing Zoning Classigication: RS -6, Single -Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 6 units/acre) <br />4. Proposed Zoning Classification: RM -10, Multiple -Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 10 units/acre) <br />5. Existing Land Use Designation: M-21, Medium -Density <br />Residential -2 (up to 10 <br />units/acre) <br />6. Maximum Number of Units with Proposed Zoning: ±48 units <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.