Laserfiche WebLink
APR28 1997- BOOK F'N.�u-'- 3� <br />applies 99 percent of the time, this situation is that 1 percent <br />where it is not correct. <br />County Attorney Vitunac gave the example that if either of <br />these structures were destroyed in a fire, it could not be rebuilt, <br />and Commissioner Scurlock felt that perhaps we should change the <br />ordinance to provide more flexibility. <br />Mary Ann Loudermilk, 6875 66th Avenue, explained that she <br />lives right behind the subject mobile home. She lives in the small <br />home on the property and her son and grandchildren live in the <br />mobile home, and this is an attempt for her son and his young <br />family to improve their situation with low interest rates. Mrs. <br />Loudermilk could not understand the County's reluctance to allow <br />this improvement to their property and described the hardships <br />involved in appearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission and <br />again appearing before the Board. She stated that her father was <br />a builder of bridges, and he built a 20 -foot wide concrete -based <br />addition to the mobile home. <br />Chairman Eggert led discussion regarding the other structures <br />on the parcel. Mrs. Loudermilk admitted that a home could be built <br />on the location where the garage now stands, but they felt it made <br />no sense because they have the spot where the mobile home is now <br />located. She also mentioned that the older home may be replaced in <br />10 or 20 years, but her son has this opportunity now and may not <br />have the same opportunity 10 or 20 years from now. <br />Commissioner Wheeler pointed out that the mobile home legally <br />has existed there for 21 years and is occupied by a family member. <br />Chairman Eggert contended that there is an alternative lot <br />just south on which a home could be built. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board (4-1, Chairman <br />Eggert voting in opposition) denied staff's appeal <br />of Planning & Zoning Commission's action on the <br />Jackson/ Loudermilk and Barkett Appeal of a staff <br />decision. <br />PUBLIC NUISANCE VIOLATION - PROPERTY OWNER BRENDA BRIGHT• SUBJECT <br />PROPERTY, 8600 64TH AVENUE WABASSO <br />The Board reviewed memo from Code Enforcement Officer Betty <br />Davis dated April 6, 1992: <br />58 <br />