My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
5/5/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:56:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and to adjust for changes in expenditures, costs, and revenues. <br />Not only is this revision mandated by policy 1.1 of the Capital <br />Improvements Element, but state growth management rules also <br />require that the CIE be amended to reflect changed circumstances. <br />In revising the Capital Improvements Element, the staff used much <br />the same methodology as it employed in preparing .the original <br />element. This involved coordinating with the budget and finance <br />departments to obtain data on past revenues and expenditures as <br />well as projected future revenue and expenditure amounts. Then, <br />each county department was contacted to determine the status of its <br />5 year CIP. For each department, information on completed <br />projects, proposed projects, costs, revenues, prioritization, and <br />other factors was collected. Based upon these data, planning staff <br />revised the various tables and the text of'the CIE. The result is <br />an accurate and up-to-date CIP for the next 5 year period with <br />revisions having been made in the CIE generally to demonstrate <br />internal consistency and financial feasibility. <br />c Hurricane Evacuation Time Analysis <br />As required by Future Land Use policy 11.3, the county must as part <br />of its annual CIE review assess the impact of new development on <br />hurricane evacuation times. This assessment meets that <br />requirement. <br />Hurricane evacuation is addressed within the Coastal Management <br />Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan. As indicated in that <br />plan element, the county displayed clearance times of less than 12 <br />hours for category 3-5 storms. This was based upon the 1988 update <br />to the Treasure Coast Hurricane Evacuation Study. <br />The Coastal Management Element also noted that the proposed <br />replacement of the Merrill Barber Bridge, scheduled for 1993, could <br />reduce estimated evacuation times below 12 hours. Since the <br />programmed bridge replacement (with the corresponding increase from <br />2 to 4 lanes) is still scheduled for 1993, the capacity enhancement <br />of the evacuation system is now even closer to being completed. <br />On the demand side, estimates and projections are more difficult to <br />determine. Not only does growth on the unincorporated county <br />portion of the.barrier island affect hurricane evacuation; growth <br />in Vero Beach, Indian River Shores,— and Orchid affect evacuation <br />times. Even growth and development in Brevard and St. Lucie <br />Counties affect evacuation times in Indian River County. <br />While exact figures are not available, it is anticipated that, <br />between the 1990 date of the comprehensive plan and the present, <br />the population of the barrier island portion of the county (both <br />incorporated and unincorporated areas) increased by only 305' <br />residents. This is based upon a review of building permits issued. <br />Based upon the estimated increase of barrier island residents, the <br />impact on evacuation times will be minimal. Besides the minimal <br />impact represented by growth, several other factors are important. <br />First, the Barber bridge replacement is still on schedule and <br />imminent. Second, both FDOT and FEMA have programmed hurricane <br />evacuation studies to be done in the next year. <br />Based upon those facts, it is staff's position that no additional <br />capital improvements are necessary to accommodate hurricane <br />evacuation needs. <br />C Summary <br />As per policy 1.1 of the Capital Improvements Element, the county <br />must revise the CIP. In updating the CIP, revisions must be made <br />to other portions of the CIE. The county does not have an <br />alternative. However, changes may be made to the revisions as <br />proposed. <br />127 <br />BOOK l� uF,1�;t;� .j,� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.