Laserfiche WebLink
M M <br />The requested D.O. amendment is necessary to accommodate Grand <br />Harbor's request for approval of a mixed use marina area conceptual <br />and preliminary PD plan (see attachment #1). The marina area <br />conceptual P.D. proposal is also scheduled for consideration at the <br />May 5, 1992 Board meeting; however, the conceptual plan proposal <br />can be considered only if the Board approves the D.O. amendment <br />request. <br />Pursuant to FS 380.06 which governs DRIs, the county may determine <br />that the development order amendment request does not constitute a <br />substantial deviation. If such a finding is made, the proposed <br />change may be treated as a "minor amendment". As a minor <br />amendment, a change in an approved D.O. can be made by the Board of <br />County Commissioners without Regional Planning Council review. <br />Pursuant to LDR section 916.05(1)1 the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission considered this request at its April 9, 1992 regular <br />meeting. At the April 9th meeting, the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of County <br />Commissioners determine that the application/request does not <br />constitute a substantial deviation and that the Board approve the <br />D.O. amendment request (see attachment #3). The Board of County <br />Commissioners is now to make a finding as to whether or not the <br />request constitutes a substantial deviation and is to approve, <br />approve with conditions, or deny the request. If the Board <br />determines that the request constitutes a substantial deviation, <br />then no final action can be taken by the Board until the <br />substantial deviation review process is concluded and another <br />special public hearing is scheduled. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />*Determination: Not a Substantial Deviation <br />Florida Statutes Section 380.06 states that the addition of <br />property to a DRI, such as is proposed with Grand Harbor's request, <br />constitutes a substantial deviation unless otherwise rebutted by <br />the applicant. Information and analysis from the applicant <br />indicate that no increase in the use intensity of the project would <br />result from approval of the request. County and Treasure Coast <br />Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) staff have reviewed the request <br />Pursuant to FS 380.06 and have indicated that the request does not <br />appear to increase overall project impacts, does not constitute a <br />substantial deviation and may be treated as a proposed change, <br />"minor amendment". Thus, staff analysis indicates that the Board <br />of County Commissioners should find that the request does not <br />constitute a substantial deviation. As of the date of this report, <br />no final determination has been received from DCA staff regarding <br />a substantial deviation determination. <br />*Effect of Request <br />Approving the request would not increase the allowable maximum <br />development intensity of the project. Approval would merely add <br />±10 acres to the overall project (see attachment #2) and would <br />allow the developer more flexibility in the arrangement of <br />residential and commercial uses within the marina area and between <br />the marina area and the project's shopping center site. <br />County staff, including public works, utility services, emergency <br />bervices, and planning, have reviewed the request and have no <br />objections to approval. However, county staff, Treasure Coast <br />Regional Planning Council staff, Department of Community Affairs <br />staff, Florida Department of Transportation staff, and the <br />developer have agreed to a condition to be attached to the D.O. <br />amendment. The condition requires the developer to update the <br />23 <br />AY 0 5 1992 MOK <br />