My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/5/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
5/5/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:56:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/05/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M M <br />Community Development Director Robert Keating recalled that <br />the last time this request was before the Board, staff recommended <br />denial, but the Board decided to transmit it to the Dept. of <br />Community Affairs in Tallahassee for their 90 -day review. The DCA <br />ORC report contained several substantive objections which focused <br />primarily on the premature development of agriculturally designated <br />lands and the proliferation of urban sprawl. Staff addressed each <br />of these issues specifically and made revisions to the staff report <br />to essentially rebut what the DCA said in certain cases. Staff <br />also explained in more detail the concept of roadways serving as <br />utility corridors and the economics and efficiency of serving land <br />on both sides of a roadway. In our negotiations with the DCA, they <br />accepted that reason, but they recommended that the County adopt a <br />new policy that would require the County to do corridor plans along <br />each of the roadways for similar characteristics so that we would <br />essentially be treating all similarly situated properties in the <br />same manner. After many phone calls and fax transmissions, our <br />planning staff and DCA did come up with the proposed wording for a <br />new policy. Policy 1.37 requires that the County look at lands on <br />each side of each one of the right-of-ways that serve as a corridor <br />and determine if the urban service area needs to be expanded or if <br />it needs to be contracted in those particular areas. Policy 1.37 <br />also requires the Board, after receiving the results of those <br />studies, to go in and make Comp Plan changes to accommodate them. <br />Staff feels that with the adoption of proposed Policy 1.37 and with <br />the revisions made to the staff report, we have satisfied all of <br />DCA's objections. <br />In response to Chairman Eggert's question on population data, <br />Director Keating advised that as of the 1990 census, the resident <br />population was 90,208 and the resident in -season population was <br />105,000 to 107,000. <br />Director Keating concluded with staff's recommendation for <br />approval of this land use amendment request to expand the urban <br />service area by 40 acres, to change the land use designation of the <br />subject property from AG -1 to R, and to rezone the subject property <br />from RFD to RS -1. In addition, staff recommends that the Board <br />adopts proposed Future Land Use Policy 1.37. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if staff had made the DCA aware that we <br />are experiencing rural sprawl going east and that we are <br />consistently balancing off with the changes to agricultural that we <br />have been getting. _ <br />Director Keating responded that we have not told them <br />specifically that we have been having a lot more rezonings into <br />that, but he anticipated that they would say that it is appropriate <br />79 <br />MAY 0 519IR 9or1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.