My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/9/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
6/9/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:59:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/09/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AS -BUILT RESOLUTIONS AND ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PAVING AND DRAINAGE <br />IMPROVEMENTS TO 101ST AVENUE BETWEEN 87TH STREET AND CR512 IN VERO <br />LAKE ESTATES SUBDIVISION <br />The Board reviewed memo from Civil Engineer Michelle Gentile <br />dated May 29, 1992: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />THROUGH: James W. Davis, P.E. <br />Public Works Director <br />and <br />Roger D. Cain, P.E4 <br />County Engineer <br />FROM: Michelle A. Gentile, ET <br />Civil Engineer <br />SUBJECT: As -Built Resolutions & Assessment Rolls for Paving and <br />Drainage Improvements to: <br />1) 101st Avenue between 87th Street and CR512 in Vero <br />Lake Estates Subdivision <br />DATE: May 29, 1992 <br />DESCRIPTION AND GOND TIONS <br />The paving of the above road has been completed. <br />assessment is as follows: The final <br />1) 101st Avenue - IRC Project No. 9043 <br />Preliminary Estimates <br />Funding sources <br />MSTU <br />Special Assessment <br />Secondary Road <br />Trust Fund <br />TOTAL <br />Final costs <br />$150,000.00 - 69.31 <br />$ 18,568.74 - 8.6$ <br />S 47.911 00 - 22.1% <br />$216,479.74 <br />$184,602.40 <br />The final assessment roll has been prepared and is ready to be <br />delivered to the Clerk to the Board. Assessments are to be paid <br />within 90 days or in 2 equal installments, the first to be made <br />twelve months from the due date and subse <br />to be due <br />yearly from the due date at an interest rateeof nt M esmentablished by <br />the Board of County Commissioners. <br />ALTERNp,T VES AND ANALYSIS <br />Alternative No 1 - Since the final costs are less than the <br />preliminary costs, the final cost breakdown would be to assess the <br />benefited owners $2.00per front foot, deduct the difference from <br />the preliminary and final costs equally between the MSTU account <br />and the Secondary Road Trust Fund Account. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.