Laserfiche WebLink
because we have a policy of not accepting roads with trees growing <br />in the middle of them because there is no source of funds to fix <br />them. According to our code these homes have access. There is a <br />properly sized street right up to their lots which has not been <br />accepted by the County. <br />ChairmanEggert assumed that the County sued on the <br />performance bond to cover the infrastructure, and Commissioner <br />Scurlock agreed and felt that action put some responsibility on the <br />County to made the necessary improvements. He felt it would be <br />right to approve some amount of money to make temporary repairs and <br />proceed with the special assessment for paving and drainage. <br />Commissioner Bird agreed but felt the repairs should be done <br />minimally, at a minimum cost, only in the low areas, and we should <br />not go in and resurface the entire road. <br />Commissioner Bowman pointed out that without proper drainage <br />it is not going to hold. <br />Commissioner Bird conceded that point, but he felt that we <br />have more of a liability problem if emergency vehicles cannot get <br />to the homes. <br />Administrator Chandler clarified that this would be unique and <br />not precedent -setting because we accepted a performance bond. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously <br />authorized staff to use their discretion and spend a <br />small but adequate amount of money to put 26th <br />Street, 94th Court and 94th Drive in a passable <br />condition, because this situation is unique and not <br />precedent -setting since we accepted money in the <br />past. <br />SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL PARR CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 <br />The Board reviewed memo from County Engineer Roger Cain dated <br />June 5, 1992: <br />35 <br />