My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/16/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
6/16/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:31 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:00:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/16/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion ensued, with OMB Director Joe Baird and <br />Commissioner Wheeler recounting the meetings of the Tourist Council <br />and the reasons for their decisions. <br />J. B. Norton, Chamber of Commerce Chairman, presented a study <br />entitled "Marketing Plan for Fiscal Year 1992-93," which detailed <br />the research and resulting information which was used to formulate <br />the recommended 1992-93 budget. <br />Commissioner Scurlock asked, and Director Baird clarified that <br />if the Board approved the recommended budget at this time, it would <br />still be subject to approval at the final budget hearing. <br />Commissioner Bird led further discussion regarding the <br />contingency and was concerned that funding was eliminated for a few <br />agencies. <br />Director Baird explained that the Tourist Council made two <br />major decisions: they wanted the Chamber of Commerce to advertise <br />more and they wanted to increase the contingency fund for things <br />that may occur in the middle of the year, because their past <br />experience showed that things always come up in the middle of the <br />year and they don't have funds available to make changes. One <br />example would be if tourism falls off, we could increase <br />advertising to promote Indian River County. <br />Commissioner Wheeler explained that the Tourist Development <br />Council's justification for eliminating certain agencies or <br />activities was because they did not fill beds. There was also a <br />cutoff date, and the Council tried to adhere to the cutoff date. <br />He further explained that the contingency was also intended for any <br />new or additional market which may open up. <br />Commissioner Scurlock preferred to see the contingency reduced <br />and those dollars reallocated. <br />Commissioner Scurlock led discussion regarding the $40,000 for <br />the tourist study, and Director Baird reported that hotel people <br />found this study to be of value because it helps them monitor the <br />changes in tourism every year as well as what they are doing right <br />or wrong in utilization of funds. <br />Deputy County Attorney Will Collins advised that this tourism <br />study would not be a continuation of the same study of numbers but <br />rather to take those numbers and develop a plan of action to target <br />the money toward programs and activities for the future. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously approved <br />the recommended budget with the exception that the <br />reserve be reduced down to $30,000.00 and the <br />$31,373.00 be reallocated to promote tourism. <br />5 <br />JUS -1'6 1992k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.