My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2016 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
04/05/2016 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2025 11:08:43 AM
Creation date
6/21/2016 12:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/05/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />policies. 'As a result, there are no rural areas of the county that would qualify for USA expansion and <br />therefore higher densities based on the existence of water and sewer service. Therefore, it is important <br />for the county to maintain its connection policies in a manner that limits the number and geographic <br />extent of properties that lie outside the USA and are allowed to connect to water and/or sewer service. <br />USA = Utility System Expansion <br />Since the County adopted its Urban Service Area in 1990, the USA has been the basis for utility system <br />expansion. Essentially, the USA established the area where water and sewer service would be provided <br />and the area where it would be prohibited. By so doing, the Urban Service Area has provided the basis <br />for effective utility system planning and capital improvements programming. <br />Because of the Urban Service Area, the utility system has grown in an efficient and effective manner. <br />That has involved providing water and sewer services in the higher density urban areas, and limiting <br />utility service outside of the USA. By so doing, the utility system has avoided some of the problems <br />that occur when water system expansion extends into rural areas to serve very low density residential <br />uses or single, low volume non-residential uses. Those problems include poor water quality from low <br />flow velocities within lines, increased maintenance costs from line flushing, and the waste of saleable <br />potable water inherent in flushing maintenance activities. To avoid those negative impacts to the utility <br />system, utility connection agreements to serve properties outside the USA should be limited to looped <br />systems or limited system extensions paid for entirely by the owner (developer) of the property served <br />and designed to serve multiple uses such as the three projects located along 12'b Street. <br />ANALYSIS <br />As structured, the proposed amendment expands the current connection exception to include approved <br />existing places of worship and camp/retreat uses that lie outside the USA, subject to three important <br />provisions. One provision is that by June 30, 2016 the place of worship and/or camp (retreat) owner <br />must submit their application for utilities connection to Utility Services. That provision establishes a <br />very short window for the project owners to apply for connection. Also, the connection application <br />process allows Utility Services to evaluate availability of capacity, system impacts, system <br />improvements, design specifications, and any necessary conditions associated with a specific proposal <br />for service/connection. Any such approval is implemented via a formal connection agreement. <br />I <br />A secondprovision is that connection to water and/or sewer service shall not be justification for a <br />density increase. That provision prevents a connection exemption from being used as a de -facto land <br />use change. <br />The third)I provision requires that any and all improvements must meet or exceed Utility Services <br />standards and all costs associated with designing, permitting, and constructing system improvements <br />and connections to be borne by the property owner (developer). That provision ensures that the initial <br />capital costs for connecting properties outside the USA are not borne by the existing system and its rate <br />payers. <br />144 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.