Laserfiche WebLink
3. LEGISLATION SUPPORTED BY THE COUNTY THAT PASSED <br /> 3.1 JUVENILE DETENTION COSTS (SB 1322 & HB 1279) <br /> ; <br /> Background.• In 2004, the Legislature enacted statutes requiring joint financial participation by the <br /> state and,counties in the provision of juvenile detention. The statute makes counties responsible for all <br /> pre-dispositional detention costs, while the QJ is responsible for post-dispositional detention costs, <br /> costs for detention care in fiscally constrained counties, and costs for the detention of out-of-state <br /> youths. The DJJ's apportionment of costs has been a source of administrative litigation by counties, <br /> with some counties disputing the DJ)'s rules and interpretation of the financial apportionment statutes. <br /> Legislation: For Fiscal Year 2016-2017, each non-fiscally restrained county will pay its proportional <br /> share of$42.5 million. Beginning in the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 and for every fiscal year thereafter, non- <br /> fiscally constrained counties are required to annually pay a total of 50 percent of the total shared deten- <br /> tion costs for the prior,calendar year. If this legislation becomes law, all of the litigating counties have <br /> agreed to'dismiss their individual cases against the Department of Juvenile Justice with prejudice. <br /> Effective:On March 29, 2016, this legislation was signed into law by the Governor. This legislation is <br /> effective upon becoming law. <br /> i <br /> 5 17 <br />