Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />f 4.1 MUNICIPAL POWER REGULATION (SB 840 & HB 579) I <br />Background,• In 1978, the Florida Municipal Power Agency (FM -PA) was created by inter -local agree- <br />ment for, the purpose of providing electric power to under -served municipalities. The FA4PA serves <br />about 311 municipalities. The FMPA is governed by a Board of Directors; with one member appointed <br />by each member municipality. Except in cases involving the ARP, the Board decides all issues concern- <br />ing each lof FMPA's power supply projects, including the approval of rate structures. Rate structures <br />for ARP projects must be submitted to, and approved, by the FMPA's Executive Committee. As per <br />Florida law, all meetings of these respective bodies that involve rate setting and discussion of the budg- <br />et must be open to the public. Following the 2014-2015 audit, the auditor general found evidence of <br />significant financial mismanagement and has made recommendations to improve transparency within <br />the FMP'A. <br />Legrs,Jon: The legislation as originally filed would have (1) promoted transparency by <br />requiring an <br />annual gancial <br />report to be prepared and presented to the Public Service Commission, Public Coun- <br />sel, and each member municipality; (2) promoted accountability by requiring that each appointed board <br />member be an elected official with a fiduciary duty to protect public funds and to serve the community <br />they represent; (3) promoted oversight by placing the FMPA under the jurisdiction of the Public Ser- <br />vice Commission with the exception of setting rates and service. <br />Amended. The legislation was significantly amended to require the FIN <br />VA gmcantl y } q SPA to submit to the PSC and <br />all it member municipalities independently prepared financial statements for each individual generating <br />asset on an annual basis. It also requires members of the Board and the Executive Committee be elect- <br />ed officials. Current members may continue to serve until July 2018. <br />Update: !The legislation died in committee. Initially, opponents of the bill refused to negotiate, but <br />when thel bill moved late in the Senate, some productive conversations took place. Indian River Coun- <br />ty will continue to work throughout the summer with representatives of the FMPA to come to an ac- <br />ceptable resolution for the City of Vero Beach and other cities that want to exit the organization. <br />14.2 ALLOCATION OF COURT COSTS (HB 573) <br />Background.Counties are permitted to assess a $65 court fee to be expended as follows: 25% to <br />court innovations; 25% to legal aid; 25% to law libraries; 25% to juvenile programs such as teen court, <br />juvenile assessment centers, other alternative juvenile programs; and remaining balance in fee account <br />must be applied towards innovations. <br />Legislation: This legislation would have increased flexibility in the ways the funds can be spent by <br />removing the distribution restrictions to allow fee revenue to be allocated towards any local court pro- <br />grams, as I prioritized by circuit judge and county commission. It also would have clarified that the fee <br />may be expended on any "local requirement" as defined in s. 29.008(2)(a)2, F. S., including any prob- <br />lem -solving courts as defined in s. 910.035, F.S. Finally, the legislation would have improved transpar- <br />ency for fee expenditures and results in a more efficient budgeting process for the revenue generated. <br />Update. The House Bill never received a Senate companion and it died in committee. The County will <br />continue to work with the Florida Association of Counties to make court costs a priority. <br />6 18 <br />