My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2016 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
04/05/2016 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2024 3:47:57 PM
Creation date
6/21/2016 12:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/05/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. LEGISLATION OPPOSED BY THE COUNTY THAT FAILED <br /> i <br /> 5.1 WASTE MANAGEMENT (SB 1192 & HB 1387) <br /> Background.• Under s. 403.70605, F.S., local governments that provide specific solid waste collection <br /> services in, direct competition with private entities must comply with the provisions of local environ- <br /> mental, health, and safety standards that are also applicable to a private company providing such collec- <br /> tion services in competition with the local government. <br /> Legislation: The legislation would have amended provisions regulating local government competition <br /> with solid waste collection companies to include disposal and recycling. Specifically, the legislation re- <br /> quired a 1 f al government to give a 3 year notice to a private waste company if it chose to displace the <br /> private company from providing collection, disposal, or recycling services. If this legislation were suc- <br /> cessful, it could have interfered with Indian River County's ability to meet the statutory requirement to <br /> recycle 75" of its solid waste by the year 2020. If the County finds itself in a position where it is not <br /> meeting the statutory requirements, it may be forced to choose between (1) an enforcement action by <br /> the State of Florida or (2) complying with the statute but displacing a private company for one or more <br /> of the referenced services and getting sued by the private entity. <br /> I <br /> Update: This legislation died on the calendar. The County anticipates that this legislation will return <br /> next year. <br /> F5.2 MEDICAL ExAMINERS ($B 620 & HB 315 ) <br /> Background: Current law requires a state medical examiner to carry out an examination or autopsy on <br /> any person who died under traumatic, suspicious, or otherwise unusual circumstances; who at time of <br /> death was unattended by a physician; or whose body is to be cremated, buried at sea, or dissected, in or- <br /> der to properly ascertain the cause of death. Although the governor appoints the state's medical examin- <br /> ers, the counties in whose jurisdictions their districts overlap are responsible for compensating them, <br /> either through a direct fee agreement or through the county's budget allocations. The fees charged by <br /> the countie's vary by location. <br /> Legislatiol: The legislation would have prohibited medical examiners from char a fee for� p ging e o examina- <br /> tion and autopsy services that a medical examiner is required to perform by law for cremation services. <br /> If this legislation were successful, the medical examiner for the 19th district would need additional fund- <br /> ing from Iridian River County as well as Martin County, St. Lucie County and Okeechobee County. <br /> I <br /> Update: Tihis legislation originally died in committee. The House sponsor placed the language into a <br /> DepartmenIt of Health bill but it was successfully taken out. During the last week of session, the House <br /> sponsor resurrected this legislation but it eventually died in messages. <br /> 7 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.