Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />5.3 MILLAGE RATES (HB 1015 & SB 1222) <br />Background: Property tax rates (i.e., millage rates) are set by local government governing boards each <br />year and applied to local property tax bases to generate funding for local government uses. During the <br />economic downturn, Indian River County chose to be a good steward and levied a millage rate lower <br />than what was permitted by law in an effort to assist its citizens in recovering from the econonuc crisis. <br />In 20071 2008, Indian River County reduced its total millage rate of the general fund, MSTU, and <br />Emergency Services by 30%. To this day, Indian River County chooses to levy a millage rate that is <br />lower than what is permitted by law because its citizens are still in the process of recovering from the <br />economic downturn. Pursuant to current law, Indian River County has earned roll -back credits <br />throughout the years. Historically, Indian River County has never used any of its earned roll -back cred- <br />its. However, in the event that it would need to open a new fire station, Indian River County might <br />need to use the roll -back credits it has earned. <br />Legislation: This legislation would have changed the formula for calculating the simple majority vote <br />maximum millage rate. Instead of using a rolled back rate assuming the previous year's maximum rate <br />was levied, the revised formula uses a rolled back rate using the prior year's aclual levy. As such, the <br />legislation would have locked Indian River County into levying the lower millage rate from the pre-%ri- <br />ous year, Iand would have prohibited Indian River County from redeeming its earned roll -back credits. <br />The legislation would have punished Indian River County, the City of Sebastian, the City of Vero <br />Beach, the City of Fellsmere, the Town of Indian River Shores and the Town of Orchid for being <br />good stewards in the past. <br />Amended. Representative Mayfield recognized P } gru ed that the proposed language was going to negatively <br />impact her community as well as countless other communities. After meeting with the sponsor of the <br />bill, Representative Mayfield successfully offered a friendly amendment which deleted the harmful lan- <br />guage from the amendment to HB 1015 thus protecting our fiscally responsible local governments. <br />Update: The legislation died on the calendar. The County anticipates that this legislation will return <br />next year., <br />5.4 SPECIAL DISTRICTS (HB 745 & SB 516) <br />Background.Special districts are governed according to chapter 189, Florida Statutes, the "Uniform <br />Special District Accountability Act." Florida law requires that certain information, including financial <br />information, be placed onto a website for the public to access. <br />Legislation: The proposed legislation would have substantially changed the manner by which all spe- <br />cial districts are required to provide budget information to the public. The bill would have required <br />each special district to publish a version of its budget online that would allow the public to view the <br />information in a variety of specific graphical and tabular formats and access multiple types of detailed <br />financial information simultaneously. If this legislation were successful, it would have a negative impact <br />on Indian 'River County, as well as other local governments, because it would require the purchase of <br />very specific software to be able to comply with the legislation. <br />Update: The legislation died in committee. The County anticipates that this legislation will return next <br />year. <br />8 20 <br />