Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> 5.3 MILLAGE RATES (HB 1015 & SB 1222) <br /> Backgrl und, Property tax rates (i.e., millage rates) are set by local government governing boards each <br /> year and applied to local property tax bases to generate funding for local government uses. During the <br /> economic downturn, Indian River County chose to be a good steward and levied a millage rate lower <br /> than what was permitted by law in an effort to assist its citizens in recovering from the econonuc crisis. <br /> In 20071 2008, Indian River County reduced its total millage rate of the general fund, MSTU, and <br /> Emergency Services by 30%. To this day, Indian River County chooses to levy a millage rate that is <br /> lower than what is permitted by law because its citizens are still in the process of recovering from the <br /> economic downturn. Pursuant to current law, Indian River County has earned roll-back credits <br /> throughout the years. Historically, Indian River County has never used any of its earned roll-back cred- <br /> its. However, in the event that it would need to open a new fire station, Indian River County might <br /> need to use the roll-back credits it has earned. <br /> Legislation:This legislation would have changed the formula for calculating the simple majority vote <br /> maximum millage rate. Instead of using a rolled back rate assuming the previous year's maximum rate <br /> was levied, the revised formula uses a rolled back rate using the prior year's actual levy. As such, the <br /> legislation would have locked Indian River County into lellr)qng the lower millage rate from the pre-%ri- <br /> ous year,Iand would have prohibited Indian River County from redeeming its earned roll-back credits. <br /> The legislation would have punished Indian River County, the City of Sebastian, the City of Vero <br /> Beach, the City of Fellsmere, the Town of Indian River Shores and the Town of Orchid for being <br /> good stewards in the past. <br /> Amended. Representative Mayfield recognized P } gru ed that the proposed language was going to negatively <br /> impact her community as well as countless other communities. After meeting with the sponsor of the <br /> bill, Representative Mayfield successfully offered a friendly amendment which deleted the harmful lan- <br /> guage from the amendment to HB 1015 thus protecting our fiscally responsible local governments. <br /> Update: The legislation died on the calendar. The County anticipates that this legislation will return <br /> next year., <br /> 5.4 SPECIAL DISTRICTS (HB 745 & SB 516) <br /> Rackgrld, Special districts are governed « <br /> P g ed according to chapter 189, Flo Statutes, the Uniform <br /> Special District Accountability Act." Florida law requires that certain information, including financial <br /> information, be placed onto a website for the public to access. <br /> Legislate I n: The proposed legislation would have substantially changed the manner by which all spe- <br /> cial districts are required to provide budget information to the public. The bill would have required <br /> each special district to publish a version of its budget online that would allow the public to view the <br /> information in a variety of specific graphical and tabular formats and access e multi l <br /> p t3'Pes of detailed <br /> financial information simultaneously. If this legislation were successful, it would have a negative impact <br /> on Indian 'River County, as well as other local governments, because it would require the purchase of <br /> very specific software to be able to comply with the legislation. <br /> Update: The legislation died in committee. The County anticipates that this legislation will return next <br /> year. <br /> 8 20 <br />