My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/05/2016 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
04/05/2016 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2025 11:08:43 AM
Creation date
6/21/2016 12:53:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/05/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.3 LOCATION OF UTILITIES (SB 416 & HB 461) <br />Bac�oun& Historically, absent an agreement providing otherwise, utility companies generally have <br />been required to pay for the relocation of a utilit , line or facility whenever such relocation is necessary <br />for the use, maintenance, improvement, extension, or expansion of a public road, highwa}�, or publicly <br />owned rail corridor. <br />In 2014 the Florida Second District <br />� Court of Appeal held that a utility is required to pay to move its <br />utility lines from one public utihty easement to another public utility easement as part of a city's road <br />construction project (Lee Count , Electric• Coop. Inc. a Cite of Cape Coral, Case No. 2D10-3781, H. 2nd Dist. <br />Ct. App[ 2014). In that case, the court held that the local electric utility was responsible for relocation <br />costs toy move power lines from an easement that had been created by recorded plat, referencing s. <br />337.403(1), F.S., which requires a utility, upon 30 days notice, to remove any lines or facilities "placed <br />upon, under, over, or along ary public road or publicly owned rail corridor" that is found by the author- <br />ity to bel"unreasonably interfering" with the use, expansion, improvement, or maintenance of the thor- <br />oughfare. <br />In 2015, the County opposed SB 896, which would have, among other things, revised the statute to <br />specify that the utility lines must be uithin the right of way (as opposed to alongside it) in order for the <br />utility to;be liable for relocation costs, but the bill did not make it through the legislative process. <br />Legislation: The bill as originally filed revised the responsibility to bear relocation costs from the utili- <br />ty owner to the state or local government when the utility lines are located within public rights-of-way. <br />This effectively would have shifted the costs currently borne by the utility company to taxpayers. Indi- <br />an River County opposed this legislation because the majority of the utility lines within the Countv are <br />within public right-of-ways. <br />Amended The legislation was amended very early in the process to only require local governments to <br />be responsible for the costs associated with relocating utility lines when they are located in public utili- <br />ty easements that run along local government rights-of-way. Considering 95% of the utility facilities <br />within Indian River County fall within the public right-of-way, and not public utility easements, the <br />County took a neutral position on the legislation. <br />I <br />Effective: This legislation was signed into law by the Governor on March 10, 2016. This legislation is <br />effective i upon becoming law. <br />6.4 CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY FOR LIFE <br />SUPPORT OR AIR AMBULANCE SERVICE (SB 742 & HB 517) <br />Background.In Florida, pre -hospital emergency medical services are divided into two categories; <br />Basic Lifel Support Services (BLS) or Advanced Life Support Services (ALS), the former involving non <br />-invasive medical care to preserve a patient's vital signs, and the latter involving more invasive tech- <br />niques (medications, intravenous fluids, etc.). An EMT or other first responder expected to provide <br />either form of care must be licensed by the state's Department of Health. In order to be licensed, a <br />Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (COPCN) must be granted to the applicant by the <br />counties in which the applicant is planning to work. Even though it is a mandatory pre -requisite to ob- <br />taining DOH licensure, under current law counties are allowed, but not required, to issue COPCNs <br />and establish standards for the issuance of those certificates. <br />10 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.