My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-131
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2016
>
2016-131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 2:33:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2016 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
09/13/2016
Control Number
2016-131
Agenda Item Number
8.E.
Entity Name
Florida Department of Transportation
Subject
Program Agreement 43rd Ave. improvements
Area
Aviation Blvd. to Airport Drive West
Project Number
431725-2-58/68-01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAP Performance Evaluation <br /> January 2016 <br /> Design Phase <br /> Select One 1) The Agency's Responsible Charge was identified at the beginning of the phase. (Tied to LAP <br /> Agreement and LAP Manual Chapter 2—Local Agency Program Certification and <br /> Performance Management) <br /> 1 The Agency failed to identify the responsible charge for the phase. <br /> 2 The Agency's responsible charge for the phased was identified once requested by the <br /> Department. <br /> 3 The Agency proactively identified the responsible charge for the phase and provided to <br /> the Department. <br /> Select One 2) The Agency's staff promptly replied to Department requests for information and provided <br /> project information in a timely manner. <br /> 1 The Agency's staff were difficult to contact, taking two weeks or more to provide <br /> requested information and/or requiring numerous follow-up requests from the <br /> Department. <br /> 2 The Agency's staff provided requested information in less than a week and/or with one <br /> follow-up request. <br /> 3 The Agency's staff provided requested information in less than 72 hours without <br /> additional follow-up needed. <br /> N/A Not applicable(No requests for information from the Department to the Agency.) <br /> Select One 3) The Agency submitted change orders for concurrence prior to implementation of the change <br /> and backup was detailed enough to support the changes and identified eligible costs. (Tied <br /> to LAP Agreement) <br /> 1 The Agency did not request concurrence with change orders prior to implementation or <br /> backup was significantly insufficient to support the changes and/or eligible costs. <br /> 2 The Agency requested concurrence with change orders prior to implementation and few <br /> revisions were needed to the backup documentation. <br /> 3 The Agency requested concurrence with change orders prior to implementation and no <br /> revisions were required. <br /> N/A Not Applicable(No change orders issued.) <br /> Select One 4) The Agency submitted invoices at least quarterly, beginning from the day the NTP was <br /> issued.Any delays in invoicing were communicated to the Department. (Tied to LAP <br /> Agreement) <br /> 1 The Agency did not submit invoices on a quarterly basis and did not communicate any <br /> reason for the delay to the Department. The Agency required constant follow-up from <br /> the Department. <br /> 2 The Agency submitted invoices at least quarterly <br /> 3 The Agency submitted invoices more frequent than quarterly. <br /> Select One 5) The Agency submitted invoices supported by proper documentation. (i.e. executed payrolls, <br /> time records, invoices, contracts or vouchers)Supporting documentation established that <br /> the deliverables were received and accepted in writing by the Agency. (Tied to LAP <br /> Agreement) <br /> Page 4 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.