Laserfiche WebLink
LAP Performance Evaluation <br /> January 2016 <br /> 1 The Agency consistently submitted incomplete and/or unsupported invoices. <br /> 2 The Agency submitted complete invoices and required minimal follow-up from the <br /> Department for clarification. <br /> 3 The Agency consistently submitted invoices that required no follow-up from the <br /> Department. <br /> Select One 6) The Agency submitted updated project schedules when requested. Any delays in providing <br /> requested information were communicated to the Department. <br /> 1 The Agency did not submit updated project schedules when requested and did not <br /> communicate the reason for the delay to the Department. <br /> 2 The Agency submitted updated project schedules when requested, and any delays were <br /> communicated to the Department. <br /> 3 The Agency submitted updated project schedules when requested without exception. <br /> N/A Not Applicable(No updates to project schedule.) <br /> Select One 7) The Agency worked with the Department to identify& resolve all potential right of way <br /> issues prior to construction. <br /> 1 The Agency did not identify potential right of way issues prior to construction <br /> commencing. <br /> 2 The Agency identified potential right of way issues prior to construction commencing, <br /> but after LAP agreement execution. <br /> 3 The Agency identified and resolved all potential right of way issues prior to LAP <br /> agreement execution. <br /> N/A Not Applicable(No right of way issues.) <br /> select one 8) The Agency submitted phase reviews into the Department's Electronic Review Comments <br /> (ERC)system.The Agency responded to all comments within the given submittal deadline. <br /> 1 The Agency did not submit phase reviews into the Department's ERC system and/or did <br /> not respond to comments within the given submittal deadline. <br /> 2 The Agency submitted phase reviews into the Department's ERC system and responded <br /> to comments with minimal follow-up from the Department. <br /> 3 The Agency submitted phase reviews into the Department's ERC system and responded <br /> to comments without follow-up from the Department. <br /> Select One 9) The Agency uploaded required design documents into LAPIT. Required documents include: <br /> plans, engineer's estimate,field notes, Proprietary Products Certification form, Utility and <br /> Railroad certifications, and other relevant design documents <br /> 1 The Agency did not utilize LAPIT and/or required constant follow-up from the <br /> Department to use LAPIT. <br /> 2 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents with minimal prompting by the <br /> Department. <br /> 3 The Agency utilized LAPIT and entered documents and data without prompts by the <br /> Department. <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br />