Laserfiche WebLink
Projects Risks: <br />There exist a number of scientific, budgetary and schedule -related `risks' associated <br />with the project. As a result, VEN recognizes that an adaptive and flexible technical <br />and management approach is required. In the event that a major risk is realized, we <br />will notify the County immediately and provide a clear and honest assessment of the <br />impacts on the project. In the case that less severe risks are realized, we will notify the <br />County and identify acceptable work-arounds to meet project deliverables and sched- <br />ules. We recognize several obvious, inherent risks to the overall project, including: <br />Risk 1: Site access is regulated by a third party, potentially causing schedule de- <br />lays and unexpected costs: Site access is regulated by the Indian River Farms Wa- <br />ter Control District (IRFWCD) and, as a result, the project schedule can be negatively <br />impacted by delays in site selection. From a budgetary perspective the location of the <br />pilot site poses a risk as it could cause VEN to incur unexpected costs, particularly if <br />we are not granted access to an area that is near to an electrical supply. <br />Mitigation 1: The main mitigation steps include: A) VEN-County agreement that the <br />schedule for deliverables will be adjusted in the event of a long delay in site selection <br />and an understanding that this would result in stage 2 pilot operations occurring pri- <br />marily in fall/winter (lower growth and nutrient uptake rates) and B) a reallocation of <br />funds and reduction in project scope to cover higher than expected electrical costs or <br />costs incurred to install off -the -grid power (solar) to run the pilot. <br />Risk 2: Pilot damage and project delays due to extreme weather events such as <br />tropical storms and hurricanes. Assuming a year-long operation, we will be operat- <br />ing during hurricane season. It is quite likely that we will experience periods of high <br />winds and heavy rains during this period that have the potential to damage the site or <br />interrupt pilot operations. <br />Mitigation 2: The main mitigation steps include: A) have a concise hurricane response <br />plan in place to respond to impending events and remove/secure all items that may be <br />susceptible to damage and B) install overflow valves on tanks to prevent overflowing <br />and loss of crops. <br />Risk 3: Vandalism and/or theft at the pilot site. The areas under consideration for <br />the pilot site are near to housing developments and are likely susceptible to incidents <br />of vandalism and theft. Damage caused by vandalism and theft have been frequently <br />observed by VEN team members at similar pilot facilities. <br />Mitigation 2: The main mitigation steps are provided for in our budget and include in- <br />stalling a fence and security camera. Additional mitigation steps will include notifying <br />the local police and the sheriffs department as to the location of the facility. <br />In addition to these broad risks that could impact the overall project, we also have <br />identified some task -specific risks, as summarized in Table A2. <br />10 273 <br />