Laserfiche WebLink
Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Table 11-4 <br />Current Level -of -Service <br />Component <br />Population(') <br />Number of Beds(2) <br />LOS (beds per 1,000 residents)i3i <br />Adopted LOS Standard (beds per 1,000 residents)141 <br />Year2013 <br />Weighted Functional <br />Population Population <br />148,001 <br />612 <br />4.14 <br />4.50 <br />140,186 <br />612 <br />4.37 <br />4.75 <br />(1) Appendix A, Table A-1 for weighted seasonal population and Table A-8 for functional population <br />(2) Source: Table 11-1 <br />(3) Number of beds (Item 2) divided by the population (Item 1), multiplied by 1,000 <br />(4) Source: Indian River County; LOS standard for functional resident is calculated based on the ratio <br />of actual LOS in terms of weighted population versus functional population <br />Table 11-3 summarizes a LOS comparison between Indian River County and counties with <br />correctional facility impact fees throughout the State of Florida. The LOS is displayed in <br />terms of permanent population for 2012 for all entities because functional population data <br />analysis has not been completed for these entities, as it was for Indian River County. In <br />addition, the number of beds for all jurisdictions presented in the following table is based <br />on gross beds. As presented, Indian River County's LOS is within the range of these <br />counties. <br />Although the LOS is measured in terms of beds per population for planning purposes, for <br />impact fee calculation purposes, the level of service is shown as the level of investment (or <br />dollar value of capital assets) per resident, which reflects the capacity investment made by <br />the County for each program area of infrastructure. This figure is shown later in this section <br />in terms of net impact cost per resident for correctional facilities, which should be included <br />in the Comprehensive Plan for impact fee purposes. <br />It is important to note that the construction of correctional facilities tend to be "lumpy" and <br />requires significant investments for large scales of construction. Indian River County <br />completed its most recent expansion in 2008, which was funded primarily with sales tax <br />revenues, and currently does not have any plans to build additional jails. In addition, the <br />average daily occupancy of approximately 450 inmates represents 75 percent of the <br />available functional capacity. As mentioned previously, correctional impact fees are not <br />being collected in Indian River County at this time, and there appears to be sufficient <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />June 2014 16 Impact Fee Update Study <br />6I <br />