My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/11/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
06/11/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 6:26:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 1:19:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
06/11/2014
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Impact Fee
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County 1 Impact Fee Update Study <br />Affordable Growth Strategy <br />In the case of correctional facilities, based on a review of capital expansion expenditures <br />between Fiscal Years 2008 and 2017, the County uses approximately $2.3 million per year of <br />non -impact fee funding. During the next 25 years, Indian River County is expected to grow <br />at an average annual rate of 1.4 percent. Figure 11-1 presents how impact fee levels would <br />change over time with different growth rates. As shown, the red horizontal line represents <br />the maximum impact fee calculated in this report. This level is considered the investment <br />needed to maintain the current LOS. Although the County may charge the maximum <br />amount of correctional facilities impact fee calculated, if the historical levels of non -impact <br />fee funding were to be continued, the County would not need any impact fee revenue to <br />continue to maintain the current LOS. <br />It should be noted that the historical average non -impact fee contribution is based on <br />spending made for the last jail expansion, which was completed in 2008. Since then, the <br />County did not have any non -impact fee spending and does not have any capacity <br />expansion projects programmed in the CIP. This is reflective of "lumpy" nature of jail <br />construction in that correctional facilities tend to require large scale investments that <br />provide sufficient capacity for a longer term than most other infrastructure types. As <br />mentioned previously, the current jail population is approximately 75 percent of the jail <br />functional capacity. <br />300% — <br />250% <br />20096 - <br />t7 <br />jo <br />150% <br />s <br />100% - <br />50% <br />0% <br />Figure 11-1 <br />Correctional Facilities Impact Fee — Affordable Growth Approach <br />IRC Average <br />Annual Growth <br />—Total Cost <br />—Maximum Impact Fee - <br />LOS Curve <br />0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.0096 4.0096 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 10.00% <br />Annual Growth Rate <br />Tindale -Oliver & Associates, Inc. Indian River County <br />June 2014 23 Impact Fee Update Study <br />5$ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.