Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />The issue of the reasonableness of the City's retail rates is indeed <br />one for the courts of Florida. Storey v. Mayo, 217 So. 2d 304, 308 <br />(Fla. 1968). Regarding what does or does not constitute "unreasonable" <br />rates, in Rosalind Holding Co. v. Orlando Utilities Commission, 402 <br />So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1981),2 the Fifth DCA articulated the <br />standard for complaints regarding the alleged unreasonableness of <br />rates charged by municipal electric utilities, such as the Town's <br />claims in the current dispute, as follows: <br />A person seeking to attack in the courts the rates charged <br />by a utility has the burden of showing that the rates are <br />outside or beyond the "zone of reasonableness," as <br />established by the evidence, and not necessarily by the PSC, <br />so as to be confiscatory or discriminatory. Absent a <br />controlling statute, a municipal utility, like any other <br />utility, is entitled to earn a reasonable rate of return on <br />its capital and its rates may be set so that it earns a rate <br />of return on its equity comparable to other similar <br />businesses. <br />Id, at 1210-11. <br />In Rosalind, the Fifth DCA ultimately affirmed a circuit court's <br />decision that OUC was entitled to earn a return in the range of 13.5 <br />percent to 16 percent; the actual percentage value was disputed by the <br />parties' expert witnesses, but the court held that even the higher <br />value did not violate the applicable standard. <br />As applied to Vero Beach, the City believes that, per the holding <br />of the Fifth DCA in Rosalind, its rates are reasonable.- The City <br />further believes that its underlying costs - while higher than the <br />City wishes they were - are reasonable and prudent, as well as based <br />upon decisions made by previous City Councils that were reasonable and <br />prudent based on all facts known to the City at the time the decisions <br />to incur those costs were made. Objectively, as of October 2014, the <br />City's current rates (using the standard benchmark of the cost for <br />1,000 kilowatt-hours of residential service) are slightly above the <br />average of Florida's municipal utilities; relative to the rates of <br />Florida's investor-owned utilities, whose rates are regulated by the <br />PSC, the City's rates are less than those of Gulf Power Company and <br />Florida Public Utilities Company, within 1.5 percent of Duke Energy <br />Florida, and greater than those of FPL and Tampa Electric Company. <br />Additionally, the City transfers 6 percent of its revenues to the <br />2Copies of the Storey v. Mayo and Rosalind Holding Co. decisions are <br />included as Attachment E to this mediation statement. <br />9 <br />aL4 <br />