My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/17/2014 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2014
>
12/17/2014 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2018 3:41:12 PM
Creation date
12/20/2016 11:34:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/17/2014
Meeting Body
Town of Indian River Shores
City of Vero Beach
Subject
Mediation Meeting Electric Utilities
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City's General Fund. This is well below the average and the median <br />for Florida's other municipal utilities. As shown on Attachment A, of <br />32 Florida municipal electric utilities, only 5 utilities transfer <br />less than 6 percent of their revenues to their general funds, while <br />another 6 also transfer at the same 6 percent -rate as Vero Beach, and <br />the remaining 20 utilities transfer at rates between 7 percent and 26 <br />percent. Accordingly, the magnitude of the City's General Fund <br />transfer cannot be said to be unreasonable by any standard, and <br />certainly not relative to the standard articulated by the Fifth DCA. <br />With regard to the Town's and County's assertions that they may <br />evict' the City from their rights-of-way (or from their ,geographic <br />limits altogether), the City firmly believes that. this issue - who, as <br />between the Town and County, on the one hand, and the Florida Public <br />Service Commission, on the other, may say what utility serves what <br />customers - belongs before the Florida Public Service Commission. In <br />the Grid Bill, the Florida Legislature expressly gave the PSC the <br />exclusive and superior jurisdiction over service territories, and over <br />the "planning, development, and maintenance of a coordinated electric <br />power grid throughout the state of Florida" and the "responsibility of <br />avoiding the uneconomic duplication of facilities." Public Service <br />Comm'n. v. Fuller, 551 So. 2d 1210, 1212 (Fla. 1989);- Fla. Stat. § <br />366.04(5). Further, the PSC has exercised its exclusive jurisdiction <br />with respect to the City's service ,area by approving the territorial <br />agreements through its Territorial' Orders. <br />As discussed briefly below, the City believes that the referendum <br />provisions of Section 366.04(7), Florida Statutes, do not apply to the <br />City. Notwithstanding the City's position, however, as a gesture of <br />good faith to address the concerns of its customers, the City has <br />authorized its Staff to work cooperatively with the Town, the County, <br />and other interested •customers toward holding a referendum and toward <br />developing an ordinance to establish a utility authority with <br />geographic representation to "operate the business of the electric <br />utility" as contemplated by that statute. <br />The City's Interests <br />The City of Vero Beach <br />service to its customers at <br />with maintaining reliability, <br />good utility practice, and, <br />endeavors to provide reliable electric <br />the lowest reasonable cost, consistent <br />operating its system'in accordance'with <br />like most municipal utilities in the <br />United States and in Florida,. earning a reasonable return' on its <br />investment, which the City's Electric Utility transfers to support its <br />General Fund. The City's service is highly. reliable; in fact, the <br />City's service is better than Florida's investor-owned utilities by <br />virtually every standard reliability metric. <br />• <br />10 <br />as <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.