Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Board of County Commissioners -2- <br />7`7 <br />July 11, 1992 <br />I wish to appeal your decision on the grounds that it is <br />unfair and I base my case on the Lucas case in South Carolina <br />and the Reahard casq•near Ft. Meyers Florida. That case said <br />that the loss -didn't have to be a total loss of land use. <br />"What your decision does is cut my land value in half. <br />The courts are now saying that iounties must compensate <br />landowners and cannot simply claim to have a good reason <br />and then regulate without paying. <br />T <br />Sinc rely, -moo <br />William ;i. Cox <br />948 N:.E. 97 Street <br />Miami, F1 33138 <br />Phone 3015 - 7547446 <br />Discussion ensued regarding the deed or deeds to this property <br />and Attorney Collins advised that if Mr. Cox purchased this <br />property with a metes and bounds description rather than two 5 -acre <br />lots, he would be grandfathered in with a 10 -acre lot. The tax map <br />indicates it is one 10 -acre tract. Attorney Collins further <br />explained that under the Comprehensive Land Use Plan this area of <br />the county is being rezoned to 1 unit per 20 acres, but Mr. Cox's <br />property will be grandfathered in as a 10 -acre tract. <br />Chairman Eggert read the following into the record: <br />21 <br />i{t70K U IJ F'M�E Ln <br />�vlL' <br />