My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/21/1992 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
7/21/1992 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:32 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:09:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/21/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />JUL R 1992 <br />DISTRIBUTION LIST <br />Commissioners _ <br />Attorney <br />Zapf Graf nel <br />bw' Works <br />RFc� 1992 565 Gullwing L)j_r)jMnunity Dev. 192 <br />o c N;,��00 y Vero Beach, FLU2968s c <br />��si®N'a'ry ,tib Finance <br />Other CflMM1UNgY <br />July 20, 1992 <br />Planning and Development Division <br />County Administration Building <br />1840 25th Street <br />Vero Beach, Florida 329..0 <br />Dear Sir: <br />The purpose of this letter to you is to oppose <br />the zoning change from residential to agricultural <br />for my property which is located at the southeast corner <br />of 66th avenue and 53rd street... approximately 55 acres. <br />Obviously, the reason for desiring the change is due <br />to: 1) the loss of value of the property; 2) the land was <br />purchased initially bas d on the value of the future land <br />use; and, 3) the property is surrounded on all sides by <br />homes,•and it would appear that additional homes will be a <br />better use for this property in the future. <br />At two of the public meetings which I attended, the <br />representatives from the Planning and Development <br />Department indicated that this was a "done deal", and that <br />any further action was inappropriate, because the state <br />had made the final decision regarding the land use plan. <br />This was done without individual individual <br />notification to the landowners. Consequently, I was not <br />aware that any action was being taken regarding my <br />property. <br />It is my understanding that government bodies,'such <br />as the county, are responsible for finanical losses due to <br />rezoning. This may be necessary to pursue in the future <br />should any loss be incurred. <br />If possible, I would like this section of the <br />southern extremity of the new, zoning to be reconsidered. <br />C <br />22 <br />Sincerely, <br />j(�j ) �� <br />Douglas S. Zapf <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.