My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-104A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2014
>
2014-104A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2018 1:20:08 PM
Creation date
1/5/2017 1:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
08/19/2014
Control Number
2014-104A
Agenda Item Number
8.Z.
Entity Name
Langham Consulting Services
Subject
Automatic Meter Reading
Advanced Metering Infrastructure
AMI Consulting Services Contract
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Brownfields Site Assessment <br />June 2014 <br />South Gifford Road Landfill Vero Beach. Florida <br />3. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES <br />3.1 Overview <br />Our understanding of conditions and potential exposure pathways that may impact health and <br />safety of the community guided development of the assessment activities described herein. <br />These exposure pathways included: <br />• Surface soils — it is important to evaluate the thickness of the landfill cover soils to ensure <br />sufficient cover to prevent direct exposure to the waste. It is also important to evaluate <br />the chemical compositions of the soil cover to verify that the cover soils are "clean". <br />• Landfill Gas — waste materials decompose as they age and typically generate methane. <br />Methane can be an explosion hazard under certain conditions. For an explosive condition <br />to exist, landfill gas must accumulate in a confined space. If buildings or other potential <br />confined spaces are a part of the development plan, a properly designed and constructed <br />control system should be in place to minimize potential hazards. <br />• Groundwater — groundwater is being investigated, remediated, and monitored separate <br />from this assessment under the purview and with oversight from the FDEP. Much of the <br />groundwater has been cleaned up; however, there are residual levels of certain <br />contaminants above cleanup target levels. Limiting groundwater use until it is cleaned up <br />to levels that allow unrestricted use will minimize potential exposure to contamination in <br />the groundwater. <br />The sampling strategy was designed to screen for potential constituents of concern (COCs) <br />typical of sites with similar historical uses, including: semi -volatile organic compounds <br />(SVOCs); Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) metals; VOCs; organochlorinated <br />pesticides (OCPs); organophosphorous pesticides (OPP); and herbicides. The assessment area <br />and sampling locations completed as part of the activities described herein are shown on Figure <br />4. Soil and soil gas samples were collected pursuant to the EPA Region 4 -approved Site - <br />Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). Field forms are included in Appendix A. <br />3.2 Soil Sampling <br />The soil sampling methodology was designed to characterize surface soils from the ground <br />surface to 2 ft BLS. Soil samples were collected on an approximate 225 ft -spaced grid (between <br />points) from 29 locations using a decontaminated hand auger (locations provided on Figure 4). <br />Prior to mobilizing, Sunshine State One Call of Florida, Inc. was notified of the proposed <br />subsurface activities to locate utilities in the vicinity of proposed soil boring locations. Two soil <br />samples were collected at each soil boring location at depth intervals of 0 to 0.5 and 0.5 to 2 ft <br />FR0766H 6 7/8/2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.