Laserfiche WebLink
Brownfields Site Assessment <br />June 2014 <br />South Gifford Road Landfill, Vero Beach, Florida <br />BLS. Soils were lithologically logged and visual observations were noted in field logs. Four <br />proposed sample locations were not sampled: (i) two locations were not sampled because waste <br />was encountered within the proposed sample interval (i.e., shallower than 2 ft BLS); and (ii) two <br />locations were not sampled because they were inaccessible. Soil samples were collected in <br />general accordance with FDEP Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). A global positioning <br />system (GPS) unit with sub -meter accuracy was used to navigate to each proposed soil boring <br />location prior to sampling activities. <br />Soil samples were couriered to Accutest Southeast Laboratory (Accutest) in Orlando, Florida <br />under chain of custody protocol for laboratory analysis of RCRA metals by USEPA Method <br />6010 and SVOCs by USEPA Method 8270 and Method 8270 select ion monitoring (SIM). A <br />subset of the soil samples (18 locations) were also analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260, <br />OCPs by USEPA Method 8081, OPPs by USEPA Method 8141, and chlorinated herbicides by <br />USEPA Method 8151. <br />3.3 Landfill Cover Evaluation <br />An evaluation of the existing landfill cover was conducted on 4 April 2014. A mini -excavator <br />operated by IRC personnel was used to excavate test pits to approximately 4 ft BLS to evaluate <br />cover thickness at ten locations (TP -101 through TP -110 shown on Figure 4) in the assessment <br />area. Observations recorded from each soil boring location completed as part of the activities <br />described in Section 3.2 and test pits completed in 2008 were used to select the test pit locations <br />for TP -101 through TP -110. Waste material encountered was segregated from cover soil by the <br />IRC mini -excavator operator. Excavated materials were temporarily staged on plastic sheeting <br />to prevent contact of the waste materials with undisturbed cover. The cover thickness and <br />presence or absence of waste to 4 ft BLS was documented in field notes and photographs at each <br />test pit location. Test pits were backfilled by the IRC mini -excavator operator using excavated <br />material, placing cover material on top of the waste. A GPS unit with sub -meter accuracy was <br />used to navigate to each test pit location prior to excavation. <br />3.4 Soil Gas Probe Installation and Sampling <br />Eight temporary soil gas probes (LFGOI through LFG08) were installed in the assessment area <br />(Figure 4) on 10 April 2014, to evaluate the composition of soil gas. Soil gas probes were <br />constructed of 3/4 -inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and 0.010 -inch slotted screen. Probes <br />were screened from 1 ft BLS to the water table, and screen intervals ranged from three to five ft. <br />A 20/30 sand filter pack was placed in the annular space from the base of the screen to <br />approximately six inches BLS. Hydrated bentonite was placed in the annular space above the <br />sand filter pack flush with the ground surface. Probes were installed using a decontaminated <br />hand auger. Probe locations were selected based on observations recorded from soil boring <br />FR0766H 7 7/8/2014 <br />