2014-119 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TASK 5.0 - PROJECT QUALITY MANAGEMENT Activities performed under this task consist of those general functions required to maintain the project on schedule, within budget, and that the quality of the work products defined within this scope is consistent with Consultant's standards and the County's expectations. Specific activities included are identified below Consultant maintains a Quality Management System (QMS) on all projects. Activities performed under this task consist of those general functions required to maintain the project on schedule, within budget, and that the quality of the work products defined within this scope is consistent with Consultant's standards and County's expectations. The Consultant will comply with its QMS, which includes independent review of deliverables, monthly project status reviews, and project close-out activities OTHER SERVICES NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SCOPE OF SERVICES Since design plans and specifications are not yet completed for the AAF project, Consultant will not perform reviews related to specific infrastructure improvements at each crossing beyond reviewing the information available in the EIS. Future services that may be required, but are not included in this scope of services, include but are not limited to: ■ Easement modifications; ■ Right -of -Way acquisition (For SSM implementation), ■ Construction, operations or maintenance oversight; ■ Meetings with FDOT and/or AAF; ■ Utility conflict identification or resolution; ■ Evaluation of County infrastructure impacts due to proposed track location, proposed rail bridges, proposed elevated track, proposed depressed track, roadway ramp modifications, proposed roadway bridges over rail, proposed stormwater pond locations, and existing stormwater pond relocations and other impacts to existing roadway, bridges, drainage, and ponds; and ■ Identification of AAF plan conflicts with long-term roadway build -outs within the County. Other items not included in this Scope of Services are• ■ Plan review; ■ Design assistance; ■ Cost estimates for SSM implantation, ■ Utility/infrastructure conflict resolution; and ■ Application for Quiet Zones. DELIVERABLES ■ Map the recommended Quiet Zone study area, inclusive of road and rail infrastructure inventory within the study area (Subtask 2 1) ■ Technical Memorandum of Quiet Zone data analysis, alternatives analysis, and recommended alternatives (Subtask 2.3). ■ Final report package (Task 3), reflecting feedback and final conclusions and recommendations for the noise monitoring (Task 1) and Quiet Zone study (Task 2) COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES The County will provide necessary traffic count information for each crossing within the County, as well as assistance/coordination with the City representatives to obtain information for those crossings that Smith A-5 536 doc