Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK A [AuL24 r <br />Attorney Vitunac suggested that we request the City to pay one <br />half of the $14,675. He noted that the City received a bid for <br />$60,000 for the job, but Director Pinto went out on his own and got <br />a bid for $14,675. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion <br />to approve the removal of the trees at a cost of <br />$14,675 and, after the work is finished, present a <br />request to the City to participate in paying half <br />of that cost, was carried unanimously. <br />SLUDGE/SEPTAGE FACILITY - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 --- <br />The Board reviewed the following memo dated 7/24/92: <br />DATE: <br />'JULY 24, 1992 <br />TO: <br />JAMES E. CHANDLER <br />COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />FROM: <br />TERRANCE G. PINTO <br />IRECYOR OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />AND <br />•. <br />PREPARED BY: <br />QT�ER,STAFFED <br />H. D.' UKE P. E. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />SUBJECT: <br />SLUDGE/SEPTAGE FACILITY <br />CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />During review of the site plans for the subject project, certain <br />revisions to paving, drainage, and fencing were found to Ke required <br />by the County's Planning and Engineering Departments. In order to <br />meet these requirements, the following changes are proposed: <br />1. Approximately 100 linear feet of opaque. slats is to be <br />furnished and installed within the existing perimeter <br />fence. <br />2. Drainage at the 49th Street entranceway is to be modified <br />-and a junction box installed. <br />3. The entrance roadway is to be paved. <br />4. In addition to the above, it was determined that a new <br />entrance gate was needed. <br />ANALYSIS• <br />Due to the time restraint on the subject project, it was decided to <br />advertise for award while the plans,were in site plan review. When <br />the required changes became known, it would have been difficult to <br />revise the construction plans without delay of the project, so it <br />was decided to incorporate the modifications by change order. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />The Department of Utility Services recommends approval of the <br />foregoing changes at the proposed cost of $44,068.00. This cost is <br />valid if the approved change order is received by Poole & Kent no <br />later than August 13, 1992. <br />30 <br />