My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/13/2016 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2016
>
12/13/2016 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2020 2:06:57 PM
Creation date
2/21/2017 1:30:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
12/13/2016
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This action must be delayed because the county cannot apply for another CDBG at this time since <br />the West Wabasso sewer project phase IF East Gifford drainage project CDBG application is <br />currently "open". CDBG regulations allow for only one open' CDBG project per jurisdiction at a <br />time. An opportunity to apply for a housing rehabilitation grant will arise after the current CDBG <br />project is completed and "closed". Consequently, the implementation date of Action 2.1 will be <br />changed from 2016 to 2019. <br />"Action 8.5 — By 2016, tire Progressive Civic League of Gifford will coordinate with property <br />owners along 32"d Avenue north of 43'd Street, and 35'h Avenue north of 45`h Street, to obtain <br />commitments for right-of-way donations so that those roads can be considered for dedication to <br />and acceptance by the County for improvement and maintenances" <br />This action is complete for now. The PCLG coordinated with county staff and did seek right-of-way <br />donations from property owners but were not able to help obtain needed right-of-way at this time. <br />New opportunities may arise in future. Consequently, the implementation date of Action 8.5 will be <br />changed from 2016 to 2022. <br />"Action 12.2 — By 2016, as requested by Gifford residents, the County's Public Works <br />Department will coordinate with street lighting providers to provide street lighting at 41" Street <br />/32nd Avenue, along 49`h Street from 5e Avenue to U.S. Highway W, and any other street <br />lighting improvements identified in the Action 12.1 street lighting plan for which adequate <br />funding has been obtained " <br />This action is in progress. Public Works submitted requests for installation of street lights to both <br />FPL and the City of Vero Beach. Currently, Public Works is waiting for actions by those two <br />electricity providers for street lighting in Gifford. Consequently, the completion date of Action 12.2 <br />will be changed from 2016 to 2017, to account for response time. <br />"Action 14.1 — By 2016, the County will consider establishing a Community Redevelopment <br />Agency (CRA) district or a tax increment financing mechanism in an area within Gifford to <br />promote economic and community development." <br />This action has been reviewed by Community Development, the County Attorney, and community <br />leaders, and is not being pursued at this time. Staff has found that establishing a CRA or tax <br />increment financing mechanism requires forming a new taxing district; will result in additional <br />taxes to residents; will impact revenues available to residents; and will require forming and running <br />a special board. At this time, it appears that a CRA or tax increment financing mechanism would <br />have a small benefit outweighed by significant set-up and operating efforts and costs. This action <br />will be re-evaluated in the future. Consequently, the implementation date of Action 14.1 will be <br />changed from 2016 to 2022. <br />"Action 14.2 — By 2016, the Counij� will consider establishing in Gifford a Safe Neighborhood <br />Improvement District (state authorized program) to reduce crime through innovative design <br />techniques and improvements, and to apply for associated funding. " <br />This action is not being pursued at this time. Staff has found that establishing a Safe Neighborhood <br />Improvement District requires forming a new taxing district; will result in additional taxes to <br />residents and potentially compete for revenues available to residents; and requires property owners <br />P75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.