Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 87 PAGE 447 <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Scurlock to adopt <br />the Resolution confirming the assessment roll. <br />THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by <br />Vice Chairman Bowman, to defer the project for one <br />year, during which time the project should be <br />reconsidered and the petition revalidated and new <br />cost estimates be established. <br />THE VICE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and failed by a 2-1 vote, <br />Commissioner Scurlock voting in opposition. <br />County Attorney Charles Vitunac advised that since only 3 <br />members of the Commission were present, the vote must be unanimous <br />to carry a Motion. The Board could attempt another motion, or <br />continue this item to the next regular meeting, at which time there <br />may be more Commissioners present. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that the paving should be done, he <br />did not want to delay it for a year, and he suggested the item<be <br />rescheduled for a time after the new Board would be seated when 5 <br />Commissioners would be present. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Scurlock, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously (3-0, <br />Chairman Eggert being absent) adopted Resolution 92- <br />176* setting a second public hearing at 9:05 A. M. <br />on November 24, 1992 at which the owners of property <br />in Floral Park Subdivision and Ranch Estates <br />Subdivision and other interested persons may appear <br />and be heard on the advisability of making paving <br />and drainage improvements to said property. <br />*This resolution number was taken out of order. <br />W <br />