My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/14/2017
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
03/14/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2020 3:26:32 PM
Creation date
4/13/2017 2:01:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/14/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
women are also less likely than men to reach the highest -paying leadership <br />and executive positions. In 2015, women held only 26 percent of pri- <br />vate -sector executive positions, with women of color particularly unlikely <br />to hold such positions. (For more information on the leadership gap, see <br />AAUW's 2016 report Barriers and Bias: the Status of IVomen in Leadership.) <br />Gender bias also factors into how our society values some jobs over others. <br />A study of 50 years of U.S. workforce data concluded that when an influx <br />of women enter a previously male -dominated profession, average wages <br />for the occupation as a whole actually decrease (Levanon et al., 2009). And <br />bias affects the choices women make in the first place. Gender norms and <br />pressures influence women's decisions regarding education, occupation, <br />time away from work, and family. These so-called explained factors show <br />that our society has specific expectations and standards for women. <br />So how do we know that discrimination and bias affect women's pay? Because <br />discrimination cannot be directly detected in most records of income and <br />employment, researchers look for the "unexplained" pay gap after statistically <br />accounting for other factors. For instance, after accounting for college major, <br />occupation, economic sector, hours worked, months unemployed since <br />graduation, GPA, type of undergraduate institution, institution selectivity, <br />age, geographical region, and marital status, AAUW found a remaining 7 <br />percent difference between the earnings of male and female college gradu- <br />ates one year after graduation. That gap jumped to 12 percent 10 years after <br />college graduation (AAUW, 2012; AALTW Educational Foundation, 2007). <br />Other researchers have reached similar conclusions about gender discrimi- <br />nation and the pay gap. For instance, a study of medical researchers found <br />an unexplained gap of 6 percent between comparable men and women in <br />the field, and a recent study of the American workforce as a whole found <br />an unexplained gap of 8 percent Qagsi et al., 2012; Blau & Kahn, 2016). <br />These estimates of the unexplained pay gap are often treated as estimates <br />of the effect of discrimination on women's earnings. These numbers may <br />be smaller than the overall pay gap, but all calculations of the gap represent <br />substantial inequalities, real individual struggles, and smaller paychecks for <br />women and their families. <br />20 <br />people with disabilities, the gender pay gap is substantial: Median pay for <br />women with disabilities is 69 percent that of men with disabilities. (These <br />data include all workers regardless of full-time or year-round status.) <br />Sexual orientation and gender identity <br />According to the Williams Institute, closing the gender pay gap would <br />significantly mitigate the poverty rates of both same-sex and opposite -sex <br />couples. Using 2012 ACS results, an institute study found that eliminating <br />the gender pay gap would lower poverty rates for couples that include at <br />least one woman (Williams Institute, 2015). The Williams Institute also <br />conducted a meta-analysis of studies of the incomes of lesbians, gay men, <br />and bisexuals, finding that gay and bisexual men are paid 10-32 percent less <br />than similarly qualified heterosexual men. The same study found that lesbi- <br />ans may be paid more than heterosexual women but still are paid less than <br />heterosexual or gay men (Williams Institute, 2007). <br />When we analyze the gender pay gap, it's also important to include people <br />who do not identify with the gender they were assigned at birth. The Wil- <br />liams Institute estimates that 1.4 million adults in the United States identify <br />as transgender (2016). Transgender people frequently experience harass- <br />ment and discrimination in the workplace because of their gender identity <br />(Grant et al., 2011). <br />Preliminary evidence from the National Transgender Discrimination Survey <br />also suggests that people who transition from male to female gender expres- <br />sion experience a drop in pay after the transition, while those who transition <br />from female to male gender expression see no difference in pay or even a <br />small increase (Grant et al., 2011). The experiences of transgender people <br />offer a powerful tool for understanding gender stereotypes and bias and <br />how these factors play a role in the gender pay gap. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.