My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/21/2017 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
03/21/2017 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 1:14:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2017 10:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
03/21/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 2 - SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSIT PROVIDERS <br />The following information addresses the Title VI reporting requirements for fixed route transit providers, <br />as described in Chapter IV of the FTA Circular 4702.113. <br />2-1 SERVICE STANDARDS <br />FTA requires all fixed route transit providers to develop quantitative standards for all fixed route modes of <br />operation for the indicators listed below. Providers of public transportation may set additional standards as <br />appropriate or applicable to the type of service they provide. <br />As part of the 2013 Transit Development Plan (TDP), the Indian River County MPO conducted a Transit <br />Quality of Service (TQOS) Evaluation. The TQOS is an evaluation of transit service from the passenger's <br />point of view. There are two primary considerations while determining transit quality of service — <br />availability of service and comfort and convenience. Availability of service includes geographical <br />locations of service, time of day, and service frequency (i.e. where, when, and how often is service is <br />provided), service frequency. Comfort and convenience encompasses several factors, such as the <br />waiting environment at a transit stop, the ability to get a seat on the bus, overall bus travel time, <br />reliability of service, passengers' perception of safety, and trip costs relative to other modes of <br />transportation. <br />The TQOS evaluation methodology was based on the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd <br />Edition (TCQSM, 2nd Ed.), sponsored and developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB). During <br />the course of the evaluation, each service measure was reviewed between nine activity centers, <br />representing the central business district (CBD), shopping centers, a college satellite campus, a hospital, <br />a (predominantly minority) residential neighborhood, and an employment center outside the CBD. For <br />each the service measure, a grade was assigned from "A", representing the best level of service, to "F", <br />representing the worst level of service. <br />A copy of the TQOS evaluation is available in Appendix C. <br />Vehicle Load <br />Vehicle load can be expressed as the ratio of passengers to the total number of seats on a vehicle. For example, <br />on a 40 -seat bus, a vehicle load of 1.3 means all seats are filled and there are approximately 12 standees. A <br />vehicle load standard is generally expressed in terms of peak and off-peak times. <br />Vehicle load, or load factor, is a ratio of the number of seats on a vehicle to the number of passengers <br />on a particular route during periods of either peak or off-peak travel. Load factors are used by transit <br />systems to determine the extent of possible overcrowding or the need for larger or additional vehicles <br />on a route. The County and SRA monitor vehicle loads through feedback from passengers and <br />operations staff, as well as ride checks. Once overcrowding is reported, staff conducts follow-up checks <br />to ensure that the vehicles assigned to these trips can accommodate peak passenger loads. Route 2, for <br />example, provides service from the Main Transit Hub to Indian River Mall and carries the highest <br />passenger loads on the GoLine system. As the Route 2 bus began to reach capacity, SRA added a second <br />vehicle to the route and then acquired a larger vehicle with a higher seating and standing passenger <br />capacity. <br />Title VI Program (2017 Update) Page 14 <br />P123 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.