My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/23/2017 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2017
>
05/23/2017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 1:41:22 PM
Creation date
7/17/2017 12:16:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/23/2017
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FDR specs. Evers IG and Bechtol have worked with numerous specifications and have <br />been involved with the development of them. <br />FDR mix designs are another area many agencies are unfamiliar with. Industry <br />advancements have brought new approaches to the forefront. Hybrid designs utilize <br />multiple additives rather than just one thereby increasing early strength and lowering <br />overall additive costs. Bechtol Materials and Testing brings this expertise to our team and <br />has extensive project experience with hybrid designs both in the laboratory during the <br />design phase, and in the field with inspection and testing. <br />Lastly quality control plays a large role in getting the kind of finished product the County <br />envisions. Does the successful low bidder have the equipment required to perform the <br />work as specified? Does the mix design provide the correct structural coefficient as <br />required by the County? How do the soils vary over the project limits? Are the appropriate <br />amount of working days allocated and has the contractor been made aware of the <br />liquidated damages at the pre -construction meeting? Who will provide inspectors with <br />adequate knowledge and training to anticipate construction problems and enforce the <br />specifications? These are some of the questions we will respond to over the course of <br />design to help guide the county to a successfully completed FDR project. <br />69th Street Left tum lane improvements: <br />The Scope calls for the addition of left -turn lanes on all approaches at the 69th St. <br />intersection with 58th Ave. We anticipate widening six feet on both sides of the roadway <br />on all approaches to minimize taper lengths, alignment shifts and impacts to utilities and <br />other roadside features. We will design the intersection to provide proper turning radii for <br />the left turning movements and accommodate the new signal. Tapers will be designed in <br />accordance with FDOT index 301, Turn Lanes and index 526, Roadway Transitions. <br />There is a deep ditch along the south side of 69th St. that is approximately 20 feet from the <br />edge of pavement allowing the additional 6 feet of pavement to be added. This will be <br />carefully evaluated as the ditch maybe within the clear zone width of 18 feet, after the <br />widening, and required shielding or pipe extensions to eliminate this unsafe condition. Also <br />there is a large water main crossing the ditch at the intersection adjacent to the straight <br />endwall that will require adjustment to allow the new return radius to be constructed. <br />Alternatively, we will evaluate shifting the widening to the north on 69th to avoid this. <br />However, we recommend removal of the endwall and replacement with a mitered end <br />section for safety reasons. This would also require adjustment of the water main. We also <br />recommend this for the U-endwall on the southeast side of the intersection as well since <br />it would be impacted by the return radii also unless the roadway is shifted north. Since <br />69th street is straight for a long distance on each approach the roadway shift at the <br />intersection could be troublesome to drivers. The installation of the new traffic signal may <br />also impact the ditch depending on the location of the new poles. Unless there is significant <br />benefit to shifting the roadway north to avoid these impacts we recommend the equal <br />width widening on both sides. <br />Along 58th Ave there is a shallower swale along the east side approximately 22 feet from <br />the edge of travel and another shallow swale on the west side just off the 8 -foot shoulder. <br />Adjustment to these will be required to maintain drainage at the intersection. However, <br />there is adequate room available to widen equally on both sides along 58th Ave. <br />34 <br />P84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.