06/20/2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Category Category Ranking Applicant Project Requested CostTotal Cost Share Match as % of Total Total Project Comments AVG SD Ranking Funding Match Project Cost Developing a Shoreline Restoration Suitability Model, - 1. Good student Involvement. 2. Fund - existing, ongoing project with high Science & 1 V UCF Phase 1: Evaluation of $ 41,454.00 $ 41,454.00 $ 22.489.00 35% S 83,943.00 ROI: restoartion suitability has broad IRL application. 3. The information Is 90.0 7.7 Technology shoreline of value, and the appioad has been standardized. The results should prove charactedst cs In the useful In the future. northern Indian River and Mosquito Lagoon 1. Is it amiable? If not, benefd is limited. Beret' makes mlmimum match. 2. The Efftcacy Fundl High priority question. Strong experimental design, team with proven Sediment Aeration as rtis expertise; Aeration as a'Compiemenr to dredging must be explored. 3. Spence & 2 B Florida Institute of a Complement to $ 120,000.00 $ 161,454.00 S 42.000.00 26% $ 162,000.00 This work is psaudkxepnwted analysis of data and Interpretation of results 88.2 5.6 Technology Technology Mupkmust Dredging in the be done carefully, i.e.,thie is not a valid test of the nun hypothesis that Indian River Lagoon aeration has no snacks). It can be a valid way to look for patterns In states and rates that appear to be related to aeration, but those results should not be considered rigorous evidence of causation. 1. Many have tried to do this and IF successful win be useful. What does NTP mean? 2. Lagconwide value. Innovative visual zatlon tool, open Development of the access, needs to align with IRL Health Assessment. 3. Attempts to hold ell State of the Indian necessary data In one database have failed multiple times in the past, with Science & 3 LW Applied Ecology Inc. River lagoon Web S 42.590.00 $ 204.044.00 $ 26,372.00 38% $ 68,962.00 even an effort to centralize one type of data (water quality in STORET) being 87.0 8.1 Technology Application (SIRLAP) rldhwled. Even if the data can be assembled in a useable format, overly and Ecological Health simplistic evaluations of their Import win substantially decrease the uUny of Gap Analyses the app. It is true that data collection has not been massaged to support the proposed use In large part because the proposed use is too simplistic, but the cordention that data exist without a purpose Is dose to baseless. 1. There are a lot of unknowns with otters. Do they move around a krt? Does Uniting Wildlife Health diet reflect feeding sites? Does a sick animal eat the same as a healthy Science & HubbsesWodd SResearch to Ecological Factors animare l? 2. UMES demonstrate ed to bettor understand IRL Wildlife 4 LW in the Heavily $ 66,000.00 $ 270,044.00 $ 28,513.00 30% S 94.513.00 health. New work on IRL otters Is valuable. Dolphin health high value as top 81.5 6.9 Technology Institute Impacted Indian River tevef predators. Hubbs and team highly experienced to do this work. 3. The Lagoon health of wildlife Is Important, but documenting the problem without a clearer plan for ddenttfying causes and solutions is probably not a high priority. Leveraging natural selection in bivalves of 1. This scored high but I'm not totally convinced. Studies have shown that the northern Indian hard clams 'clam up" so finding ones that do not. or do so less often may be Science & 5 V OF River Lagoon to $ 62.200.00 $ 332,244.00 $ 77,146.00 55% $ 139,346.00 an impossible task. 2. Clam are emerging as an Important issue that must 81.0 3.8 Technology enhance water quality be addressed: would like to see date that states clams are available and that and accelerate experimental design Is light. If funded, IRLNEP needs to brig FDACS. Sea ecosystem recovery Grant, Industry and universities together to work on this problem. (n OD