Laserfiche WebLink
h as <br />total <br />Total Project <br />Comments <br />AVG <br />SD <br />eat <br />Cost <br />1. This should be turned into a collaborative effort with UCF - shared <br />funding. 2. In part, this project is redundant to ongoing efforts at Sebastian <br />Inlet although it greatly expands those long-term efforts. 3. Low match and <br />K <br />$ 128.831.00 <br />could improve the cost-sharing by partnering with other turtle study. 4. 2 <br />80.8 <br />3.0 <br />different proposals differ in location only; experimental design needs mom <br />detail; sea turtle research groups need to get together on IRL focused <br />research. 5. A single project combining both proposed efforts would be a <br />better approach. <br />1. Doable but salinity regime could change over time, or change oyster <br />natural distribution. 2. Important role for fisheries and aquaculture folk; info <br />Yo <br />$ 99,317.00 <br />could inform management decisions; Interesting appraoch worth exploring. <br />80.3 <br />4.5 <br />3. The approach Is somewhat risky, and the outcomes did not seem dearly <br />defined. <br />1. Valuable new technology application with example from coral research. <br />+e <br />$ 69.479.00 <br />Should be explored and funded? High value, strong proposal. 2. Potentially <br />80.2 <br />8.5 <br />useful project, but nut a very high priority need. <br />1. Planning tool. Does not account for southern IRL. Minimum match. 2. <br />Important planning tool for CCMP. If funded, needs to include entire IRL; <br />' <br />$ 125,000.00 <br />outward look to 2025 Important to decislon-making; Team has strong <br />00.2 <br />7.9 <br />credentials and experience. Recommend fund) 3. It would be better to link <br />this modeling with ongoing efforts mom explicitly. <br />1. Expensive. 2. This would be an enhancement for tracking HABs but may <br />not be a critical need. Barely above the minimum match. 3. Smart drifter <br />network; need to look at big picture: does system integrate with and <br />6 <br />$ 191,739.00 <br />complement existing sampling and monitoring efforts; love intelligent <br />79.0 <br />6.7 <br />monitoring capacity. Match?? 4. Uncertain about the utility of this work <br />given the relatively limited number of parameters that will be measured well. <br />A clearer definition of the outcomes would be useful. <br />1. This should be fumed into a collaborative effort with Loggerhead Marine <br />Life Cerner - shared funding. 2. Great match. Would benefit from partnering <br />with other turtle group. 3. Similar to the other sea turtle project proposed; <br />$ 83.222.77 <br />team has strong experience and 36 jeers of long term research on IRL; <br />79.0 <br />7.3 <br />cutting edge skin mierobiome work. Worthy of funding and contributes to long <br />term date. 4. A single project combining both proposed efforts would be a <br />batter approach. <br />