Laserfiche WebLink
Consent Agenda Item <br />• <br />1 <br />INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA <br />DEPARTMENT OF UTILITY SERVICES <br />Date: November 22,2017 <br />To: Jason E. Brown, County Administrator <br />From: Vincent Burke, P.E., Director of Utility Services <br />Prepared By: Cindy Corrente, Utilities Finance Manager <br />Subject: Request for Additional Hours for Task 4 for Automated Meter Reading <br />(AMR)/Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AM 1) <br />DESCRIPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: <br />On August 19, 2014, the Indian River County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approved the award of <br />RFP #2014-043 to Langham Consultants for Automated Meter Reading (AMR) and Advanced Metering <br />Infrastructure (AMI) consulting services. On June 14, 2016, the BCC authorized staff to proceed with Tasks <br />4 and 5 of the project. Task 4 consisted of developing an RFP for AM I system acquisition and assisting with <br />the evaluation and scoring of proposals. This task consisted of four hundred and eighteen (418) hours for a <br />cost of $81,510. Task 5 will consist of contract negotiations. One hundred and sixty-four (164) hours are <br />budgeted at a cost of $31,980 for task 5. <br />On October 24, 2017, the BCC rejected all proposals received in response to RFP 2017-041 and <br />authorized staff to revise the scope of work and selection criteria in order to reissue a new solicitation <br />that will afford solutions more in line with the needs of the Indian River County Department of Utility <br />Services (IRCDUS). Staff is currently working on the revision. The intention was to complete this process <br />in-house and thus avoid incurring any additional consulting costs affiliated with development of the RFP. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Staff worked with Langham Consultants to develop the initial RFP for services. As the process evolved, <br />staff began to get a better understanding of AMI systems and the powerful data that is obtained <br />through use of such a system. As staff realized that moving to a countywide AMI solution would greatly <br />impact the volume of meter data points that would be gathered monthly, they realized that there was a <br />missing component in the RFP. <br />Under the current business practice, each meter is read once a month. This means that we obtain one <br />data point for each account per month. This data is stored in the utility billing software and used strictly <br />for billing purposes. With an AMI system comes the ability to gather unlimited data points each month. <br />Some of the benefits of an AM I system include the ability to gather and track usage data throughout the <br />system in order to monitor per capita usage, track water loss, and encourage conservation. A typical <br />system may be programmed to gather reads on an hourly basis. If IRCDUS were to choose such a typical <br />system, we would increase from gathering approximately 50,000 data points a month to 36,000,000 <br />data points a month. With all of the additional data comes a need to have a system that can manage as <br />well as store and analyze the data. Therefore, it became apparent that moving forward with an AMI <br />system should also include a Meter Data Management (M DM) system as well. Thus, the consultant was <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />P19 5 <br />