My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/6/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
10/6/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:20:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/06/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amount is requested by the Contractor. (The basic <br />documentation for this increase is contained in <br />Attachment "B" as submitted by the Sims <br />Corporation. <br />This $816.75 also is a legitimate "extra charge" <br />due the Contractor because of legislation beyond <br />his control. <br />3. Major, unanticipatable increased lumber costs, <br />resulted in an increase in cost of the "lumber <br />package" for the building were passed through to <br />the Contractor by the supplier in the amount of <br />$1,628.99. (Documentation in the form of a <br />September 1, 1992 quotation and actual invoicing <br />by J.M. Lumber Inc. in May, 1992 are contained in <br />Attachment "C".) <br />Again, since this increase resulted in March, <br />1992, this request for an "extra" of $1,628.99 for <br />unforeseen (at bid time) lumber increases is a <br />legitimate cost which should be borne by the <br />4. When originally designed, no provisions were <br />made to include all plumbing, etc. for an ice <br />maker in the building. The subsequent need for <br />this work, after local investigation by the County <br />Traffic Engineer indicated that the most <br />economical approach was to have the Contractor of <br />Record install the needed materials and equipment, <br />resulted in a $291.00 extra charge. <br />This is a legitimate "extra". <br />5. Prior to final form approval of the building slab, <br />a check of field conditions indicated that actual <br />requirements varied from site information used <br />during design. This required the final slab <br />elevation to be raised 3 3/8" to allow joint use <br />of an existing on-site septic tank. (This was <br />considered the most cost feasible arrangement <br />given the minimal flow anticipated from the new <br />building and the need for a future Comprehensive <br />Sewage System for the entire <br />Complex). Public Works <br />The resultant additional formwork required an <br />additional cost of $175.00 which is also a <br />legitimate "extra" claim by the Contractor. <br />Although a major portion of the total Change Order amount of <br />$3,258.74 was known at the beginning of construction, the <br />County Traffic Engineer did not have all of the detailed <br />information required. Also, in order to mi <br />Order requests and keep administrative costs to aZ min e <br />the Contractor agreed to hold any Change Order claims until <br />the building was complete per the original contract. <br />All obligations of the Thomas M. Sims C <br />delivered and the building has been inspectteedany as a been <br />by the County. approved <br />County Forces are now completing all site work, <br />Contractor obligations have been fulfilled. but all <br />27 <br />P'sj `� <br />BooK F,�cE r J2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.