Laserfiche WebLink
gae <br />6 rExpansion i f <br />in Florida �. <br />understanding with AAF to act as a conduit for the $1.75 billion PAB allocation. The <br />Board's vote, however, was later revealed to be invalid due in large part to the fact that <br />the voting Board members' terms had expired. In the Spring of 2015, attempts were <br />made to establish a properly constituted Board, but there continued to be flaws in the <br />constitution of the FDFC's Board of Directors, including lack of Senate confirmation, a <br />lack of the statutorily required appointment of at least three bankers and potential <br />conflicts of interest. <br />How Will These Tax Exermt Bond Dollars Be Used? <br />Based on the documents that were part of the FDFC's meeting packet, AAF will use the $600 <br />million to retire its current high price debt, replacing it with lower price debt. Specifically, <br />documents indicate that AAF intends to use almost all of the money from the new tax exempt <br />bonds to pay off the only prior funds it had raised from the market—originally $405 million at <br />12% but now ballooning above $500 million with interest owed. <br />In addition, documents indicate AAF intends to payoff $98 million of the Siemen's <br />manufacturer financing of the five trains sets it purchased. The $98 million is only a portion of <br />the cost of the five train sets, and leaves AAF with a debt of approximately $160 million. The <br />trains were financed by Siemens to accommodate the AAF buyer. <br />In a nutshell, nearly 100 percent of the new $600 million in financing would go to refinance debt <br />already incurred in Phase 1. All AAF has accomplished is to get the right to issue tax exempt <br />bonds to replace expiring or expensive existing debt that was either coming due (the trainsets) or <br />was very expensive (the "toggle" bonds). <br />Further, a recent article in Bond Buyer reveals the bonds will not be "rated" (because they are <br />unrateable) and that they are "junk bonds". <br />Updated Ridershiv and Revenue Studv <br />The OPPAGA Research Memorandum dated November 13,-2017 stated: "FDFC staff is <br />responsible for analyzing information provided by the borrower... FDFC also ensures that the <br />borrower has provided documents to demonstrate that the proposed project is financially feasible <br />and has the ability to repay investors." (Page 4) <br />FDFC's most recent meeting materials included a new Ridership and Revenue Study prepared by <br />Louis Berger US, Inc. ("Louis Berger") for Phase I of the project. This 2017 study (titled <br />"Brightline Ridership and Revenue Study: Miami – Fort Lauderdale – Palm Beach Segment" <br />dated October- 2017) sets forth the projections as to ridership and revenue that underpin the pro <br />forma financials for the bond issue that FDFC approved. As explained below, this 2017 study is <br />remarkably more optimistic about the prospects for the new train line than the 2013 study that <br />Louis Berger prepared for the senior secured PIK toggle notes that AAF marketed in 2014. (The <br />4 <br />145-8 <br />