Laserfiche WebLink
Expansion <br />i#fi9 rn Florida . <br />revenue in 2020 would be $47 million instead of $142 million. This would reduce 2020 cash <br />flow after debt service from a positive cash flow of $51 million to a negative cash flow of $44 <br />million. The negative cash flow would be higher in magnitude at an interest rate higher than <br />4.00%. <br />On an aggregate basis for the 5 -year period 2018 through 2022, if revenue were in line with the <br />2013 Louis Berger study instead of the 2017 Louis Berger Study (with its 300% revenue <br />increase), the revenue for this 5 -year time period would be $204 million instead of $612 million. <br />This would reduce cash flow after debt service for the 5 -year period from a positive cash flow of <br />$156 million to a negative cash flow of $252 million. The negative cash flow would be higher in <br />magnitude at an interest rate higher than 4.00%. <br />Based on the foregoing, it would appear that the extraordinarily more optimistic revenue <br />forecasts presented in the 2017 Louis Berger study are absolutely critical to the marketing of the <br />2017 tax-exempt bonds. The 2017 bonds, as structured, could not be marketed using the 2013 <br />Louis Berger revenue projections, because the proforma presented in the draft 2017 preliminary <br />offering memorandum would indicate massive negative cash flows after debt service. <br />There is no evidence from FDFC's deliberations that: (a) AAF informed FDFC that the changes <br />in Louis Berger's projections for the project form the keystone to the proforma financial <br />analysis presented for the project; or (b) FDFC provided any scrutiny whatsoever to whether <br />Louis Berger had any bona fide basis for increasing its revenue projections for the project by <br />300% between the time it prepared the 2013 study and the 2017 study. Louis Berger's 2017 <br />study does not acknowledge that its AAF forecasts have become far more optimistic since its <br />prior 2013 study. Louis Berger's new -founded optimism for the project is particular surprising <br />in light of the following: <br />0 Tri Rail fares (in 2016$) are only $6.90 between Miami and West Palm Beach; $5 <br />between Miami and Vt. Lauderdale; and $6.25 between Ft. Lauderdale and West Palm <br />Beach. Tri Rail is a slower service, with greater headways between trains at certain <br />hours, but its fares are far below those projected for the AAF project. <br />• An entirely new transportation industry has emerged between 2013 and today: the <br />Uber/Lyft phenomenon. These services are widespread in southern Florida. These taxi <br />companies provide beginning -of -journey to end -of -journey service, eliminating the need <br />for travel to stations and travel from stations to the passenger's ultimate destination. <br />According to the 2017 Louis Berger study, the Uber fare is currently $27 - $35 between <br />Miami and Ft. Lauderdale — about the same as a single ticket on the AAF train. But Uber <br />takes the rider door-to-door and does not charge more for a second or third passenger. <br />• <br />