10/20/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Scurlock suggested that a warning be given before the fine is actually assessed, and Mr. DeBlois stated that this would be incorporated. Director Keating added that discretion is given to the field officers in this regard; the authorization requirement is there to avoid charging a $500.00 fine in those gray areas. He added that there is a verbal warning opportunity here. Commissioner Bird wanted to know whether the Code Enforcement Board has the option of reducing the amount of the fine. Director Keating answered that the case can either be dismissed or a fine assessed, but the fine cannot be reduced. ON MOTION by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Scurlock, the Board unanimously approved the Unlicensed Contractor Enforcement Procedures Manual and authorized staff to begin using citations as a contractor violation enforcement means, and try to find a way to implement a warning system. A COPY OF SAID MANUAL IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CLERK TO THE BOARD INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JUDICIAL COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION BID AWARD Director of General Services Sonny Dean presented the following memo dated October 12, 1992: DATE: OCTOBER 12, 1992_: TO: HONORABLE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THRU: JAMES E. CHANDLER COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: H.T. "SONNY" DEAN, DIRECTO DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES SUBJECT: INDIAN RIVER COUNTY JUDICIAL COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION BID AWARD BACKGROUND: On January 21, 1992, the Board approved the subject project as recommended and authorized staff to proceed with final design for bidding. ANALYSIS: On September 1, 1992 the project was advertised for bid and bids were opened on Tuesday, October 6, 1992. There were twelve contractors that purchased plans but only seven submitted bids. The results were as follows: 23 OCT 01992 POOF 7 i►lsz 808