Laserfiche WebLink
- M <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />_The.potential impact of the subject request upon surrounding land <br />uses is an important issue concerning this property. The subject <br />property is -located across 73rd Street from Copeland's Landing <br />West. This is an approved, but as yet unfinished, Planned <br />Residential Development subdivision. Additionally, the area <br />adjacent to and east of the subject property is designated for low <br />density residential development. <br />A land use change for the subject property would have two negative <br />impacts upon ,existing and proposed residences in the area. <br />First, there would be a lack <br />and residential development. <br />land use and zoning district <br />question that the resulting <br />adjacent residential areas. <br />neighborhood quality of life. <br />of compatibility between commercial <br />Given the* type of uses allowed by the <br />requested for the site, there is no <br />uses would be incompatible with the <br />It would be an intrusion into the <br />The second negative impact from "the proposed land use amendment <br />involves more than the property itself; it relates to all <br />residentially designated areas along U.S. Highway #1. These areas <br />would be affected, because the requested change would provide an <br />impetus for other property owners to request that their land use <br />designation be changed to commercial/industrial. The result would <br />be commercial/industrial land use designations all along the east <br />side of U.S. Highway #1. This would cause compatibility problems <br />along the east side of U.S. Highway #1. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />In addition to a review of compatibility with surrounding uses and <br />consistency with the comprehensive plan, environmental impacts of <br />the proposed change have also been reviewed. <br />In implementing the policies of the county comprehensive plan, LDR <br />Chapter 929 requires that 15% of the native upland plant community <br />existing on site be preserved via the establishment of a <br />conservation easement in conjunction with site development. The <br />15% may be reduced to 10% if the native preserve area is one <br />contiguous "clump", rather than a linear buffer strip or multiple, <br />noncontiguous areas. County regulations allow the option of a fee - <br />in -lieu payment instead of a set-aside, based on the assessed value <br />of the subject property. <br />The upland set-aside requirement would apply to the subject <br />property under the proposed commercial designation as well as under <br />the present residential zoning and land use category. Therefore, <br />from the regulatory standpoint, the proposal would not affect the <br />minimum amount required by the county for native upland protection. <br />The subject property has not been surveyed for rare or endangered <br />plant or animal species. An environmental survey will be required <br />prior to site development, under either the present or proposed <br />zoning and land use designation. If the environmental survey <br />reveals the presence of listed rare or endangered species, the <br />applicant would be required to coordinate with jurisdictional <br />wildlife agencies to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, <br />state, and local requirements concerning such species' (and <br />habitat) protection. <br />35 <br />No La I��Z BOOK <br />