My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/17/1992
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1992
>
11/17/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:34 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 11:32:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan on February 13, <br />19901 the subject property's land use designation was mixed use. <br />The 1982 Comprehensive Plan explains that the mixed use district <br />designation is for areas with no dominant land use pattern. Old <br />Dixie was identified as one such area because of its mix of <br />residential, commercial and industrial uses. <br />For all such mixed use areas, the 1982 Comprehensive Plan provided <br />that zoning would control land use. This plan also stated that the <br />zoning should be established based upon the predominate land uses <br />in the area. For the Old Dixie area, this has historically <br />resulted in residential zoning on the west side of Old Dixie <br />Highway and non-residential on the east. One exception to that <br />pattern is the area north of the subject property, across 9th <br />Street, which is an extension of the 12th Street/Old Dixie <br />commercial area. Even in this case, 9th Street has served as a <br />hard, man-made, 60 -foot wide buffer and dividing line between <br />commercial and residential areas. <br />With the adoption of the revised Comprehensive Plan, the mixed use <br />district land use designation was eliminated. Areas formerly <br />designated as mixed use were designated as either residential or <br />commercial/industrial in the new plan. Because the west side of <br />Old Dixie Highway, south of 9th Street, including the subject <br />property, was zoned for and developed as single-family residential, <br />the new land use plan designated this area as L-2 for low density <br />residential uses. Since the Comprehensive Plan was adopted, no <br />changes have occurred which would warrant amending the plan for the <br />subject property. Therefore, the criteria referenced in Future <br />Land Use Policy 13.3 have not been met. <br />This fact was reinforced in 1991. In January of that year, Trevor <br />Smith, the owner of the northern -most parcel of the subject <br />_property, applied. to have his parcel's land use designation changed <br />to C/I. On April ll,, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />voted 4-2 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny <br />the request. On May 21, 1991, the Board unanimously followed that <br />recommendation and denied transmittal of the request to the <br />Department of Community Affairs. There have been no changes in <br />circumstances affecting the subject property since this action was <br />taken. <br />Historically, residential development has been feasible on the west <br />side of Old Dixie, and it still is. In fact, single-family <br />residences exist on the west side of Old Dixie to the south of the <br />subject property almost the entire length of the road. Changing <br />past policy and amending the plan for this request would affect <br />every other parcel on the west side of and abutting Old Dixie <br />Highway. Circumstances are not substantially different for other <br />such parcels south of 8th Street on the west side of Old Dixie <br />Highway. Parcels on the west side of Old Dixie and south of 8th <br />Street are also located across the street from commercial areas. <br />Since other parcels on the west side of Old Dixie are characterized <br />by circumstances similar to the 'subject site, it is anticipated <br />that approval of the subject request would result in comprehensive <br />plan amendment requests for those other parcels. A domino effect <br />could then occur with the entire west side of Old Dixie being <br />designated as commercial. <br />The subject request has, in fact, proved this domino effect. In <br />1991, only one lot owner requested a C/I land use designation. The <br />present request, however, increases the area proposed for <br />redesignation to the entire block of Old Dixie Highway from 9th <br />Street to 8th Street. <br />67 <br />w <br />POCK <br />10!/ 1997 jr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.