Laserfiche WebLink
Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />The proposed rezoning would have no more of an adverse impact on <br />environmental quality than the -present zoning. Under both the <br />existing RS -6 zoning and the proposed RM -10 zoning, the county's <br />10/15% native upland plant community set-aside requirement, as well <br />as wetland protection regulations, will apply. These issues will <br />be addressed at the time of site development. <br />Zoning District Configuration <br />As indicated in the Description and Conditions section of this <br />staff report, the IRCHA parcel is unusually configured, and <br />rezoning only that one parcel would result in an irregular zoning <br />district boundary. Such irregular zoning district boundaries not <br />only make zoning administration more difficult; they also can <br />create use conflicts. Attachment 2 shows the IRCHA property. <br />For the reasons stated above, staff determined that the property to <br />be rezoned should be squared off. Staff then identified the total <br />area which warranted rezoning and identified the individual parcels <br />comprising this area. Attachment 3 depicts the squared off area, <br />while Attachment 4 shows the individual parcels within this area. <br />County planning staff subsequently contacted the property owners of <br />parcels 1 through 8 and 10 on Attachment 4 to determine if those <br />owners would object to their parcels being rezoned to RM -10. Of <br />the nine owners, six (parcels 1-5, and 10) expressed no objection <br />to having their property rezoned; two (parcels 6 and 8) did express <br />objection, while the owner of parcel 7 was unable to be contacted <br />by phone and did not respond to the letter which was sent to the <br />property owners to gather their opinions. <br />Based on the property owners' responses, staff feels that all <br />shaded areas depicted on attachment 4 should be rezoned to RM -10. <br />Besides the IRCHA tract, the shaded area includes parcels 1-5 and <br />10. <br />Conclusion <br />The request to rezone the subject property to RM -10 is consistent <br />with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency requirements, <br />will not negatively impact environmental quality, and is compatible <br />with the surrounding area. Not only does the subject property have <br />the necessary utilities and roadway access required by multiple - <br />family developments, but it is also accessible to other urban <br />services. As proposed, the RM -10 zoning would provide an efficient <br />use of both land and public services, and provide increased <br />affordable housing opportunities. For those reasons, staff <br />supports the request. <br />Recommendation <br />Based on the analysis performed, staff recommends that Board of <br />County Commissioners rezone the subject property from RS -6 to RM - <br />10. Additionally, staff recommends that the Board of County <br />Commissioners authorize staff to undertake a county initiated <br />rezoning of parcels 1-5 and 10 as depicted on Attachment 4, from <br />RS -6 to RM -10. <br />43 <br />L_ 0® BOOK 8.8 F'v ;f 2- <br />