My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/6/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
4/6/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:56:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/06/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- ® M <br />only is land use compatibility important with respect to a PRO <br />rezoning, -but even more important is the effect that a PRO rezoning <br />has on the land use pattern. Structured for limited use in <br />specific situations, the PRO district was not established as an <br />alternative to expanding commercial nodes through land use plan <br />amendments; instead, it was established to provide for -office type <br />uses in those areas which are no longer appropriate for strictly <br />single-family residential uses but also not appropriate for a <br />complete range of commercial uses. This is reflected in the PRO <br />district's purpose and intent section. <br />As stated in the county's land development regulations, the intent <br />of the PRO district is to encourage development in areas which are <br />considered marginally suitable for residential use, but not <br />suitable for a broad range of commercial uses. Further, the PRO <br />district is intended to aid in the redevelopment of such areas when <br />they are deemed blighted or declining. The PRO district is also <br />appropriate to prevent the anticipated decline of an area. <br />Accordingly, the PRO district may be established in areas in <br />transition from residential to commercial land uses. <br />Based upon its analysis, staff has determined that the subject <br />property is not appropriate for strictly residential development <br />(although it may have been in the past) or a broad range of <br />commercial uses. Staff has concluded, however, that the subject <br />property is appropriate for PRO district designation. Staff's <br />conclusions are based upon several factors. Foremost among those <br />factors is the proximity of the property to existing commercial and <br />institutional uses. Both the existing commercial to the north and <br />the offices to the east affect the property, as does, to a lesser <br />extent, the church to the south. In fact, the subject property is <br />bordered on only one side by residential uses. Additionally, the <br />subject site's configuration and its location on a major roadway <br />(43rd Avenue), near the busy S.R. 60 and 43rd Avenue intersection, <br />further justifies the PRO rezoning. <br />Providing additional justification for the PRO rezoning is the lack <br />of new development on the subject property. Each lot on the <br />subject property is either vacant or developed with an older home. <br />This situation indicates that the'subject property has an increased <br />potential to deteriorate. The county's land development <br />regulations specifically state that the PRO district is designed to <br />encourage the development of vacant land and the redevelopment of <br />declining residential areas. While potential deterioration alone <br />does not warrant a PRO rezoning, this condition may be resolved by <br />a PRO designation. <br />Not all land adjacent to existing commercial uses or located on <br />major roadways is appropriate for PRO zoning. If it were and if <br />PRO zoning were applied, the result would be strip commercial <br />development and more land use incompatibilities. <br />This property, however, has unique characteristics that make it <br />appropriate for PRO designation and inappropriate for strictly <br />residential uses or a commercial designation. It is inappropriate <br />for strictly residential development because it is bordered on <br />three sides by commercial and institutional uses and it fronts a <br />major roadway near a major intersection. The lack of new <br />development on the subject property demonstrates its <br />inappropriateness for strictly residential development. The <br />subject property is inappropriate for a commercial designation <br />because the site is not within a commercial node; the site <br />presently supports single-family residences; and adjacent land is <br />designated for single-family use. This property is appropriate for <br />PRO district designation because it meets PRO district size and <br />31 <br />APR ® o ig- BOOK 89 PRUE 7>8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.