Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />- Economic Development Policy 8.4 <br />M <br />Economic Development Policy 8.4 states that the county shall <br />designate land for higher density housing. Since RM -10 is the <br />highest density allowed under the M-2 Land Use Designation, the <br />proposed zoning is consistent with Economic Development Policy 8.4. <br />- Economic Development Policy 8.5 <br />Economic Development Policy 8.5 states that the county shall direct <br />higher residential densities to certain areas to reduce cost per <br />unit and thereby provide more affordable housing. It is staff's <br />position that the subject rezoning request is consistent with <br />Economic Development Policy -8.5. <br />Based upon its review of the county's comprehensive plan policies, <br />staff feels that the proposed rezoning is not only consistent with <br />the plan, but will serve to implement several specific plan <br />policies. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />It is staff's position that a multiple -family zoning district would <br />be appropriate for the subject property and would result in <br />development compatible with the surrounding area. Because the area <br />to the west is already zoned for and is planned to be developed <br />with multiple -family housing, and the area to the east is zoned for <br />multiple -family development, rezoning the subject property would <br />result in an extension of an existing land use pattern. <br />The principal impacts of the proposed rezoning would be on the <br />single-family areas to the south of the subject property. Any such <br />impacts though, would be minimal. Unlike commercial, multiple - <br />family development provides an acceptable transition to single- <br />family uses. Whereas commercial sites often produce impacts such <br />as lights, noise, and other activities which adversely affect <br />single-family residential areas, multiple -family development is <br />similar to single-family, differing primarily in dwelling unit type <br />and density. <br />Even though the impacts are anticipated to be minimal, there are <br />several county land development regulation provisions which would <br />serve to mitigate any potential negative effects associated with <br />this request. Among these provisions are the newly enacted buffer <br />requirements for occasions when a multiple -family project in an RM - <br />10 district abuts a single-family zoning district. Another <br />provision is the requirement that multiple -family developments <br />undergo site plan review. Through this process, potential impacts <br />will be minimized with site design. Additionally, 47th Street <br />provides a physical separation between the subject .property and <br />most of the RS -6 zoned single-family residential area to the south. <br />For these reasons, the proposed rezoning can be expected to have <br />only minimal impacts on the adjacent property. <br />Potential Impact on Environmental Quality <br />The proposed rezoning would have no more of an adverse impact on <br />environmental quality than the present zoning. Under both the <br />existing RS -6 zoning and the proposed RM -10 zoning, the county's <br />10/15% native upland plant community set-aside requirement will <br />apply. These issues will be addressed at the time of site <br />development. <br />45 <br />BOOK 89 FA6F.247 <br />I <br />