My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/13/1993
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1993
>
4/13/1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:03:53 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 12:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 89 PAGE 319 <br />APS X31993 , <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development... The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes- standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is <br />required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects,-�county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning district. The <br />site information used for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Property: <br />2. Size of Area to be Rezoned: <br />3. Existing Zoning Classification: <br />#4 acres <br />#4 acres <br />A-1, Agricultural <br />District (up to 1 unit/5 <br />acres) <br />4. Proposed Zoning Classification: RM -6, Multiple -Family <br />Residential District (up <br />to 6 units/acre) <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Existing <br />Zoning Classification: <br />6. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Proposed <br />Zoning Classification: <br />- Transportation <br />2 units (1 unit/parcel) <br />24 units <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the property indicates that the existing level of <br />service "D" or better on C.R. 510 would not be lowered. The site <br />information used for determining traffic is as follows: <br />Existing Zoning District <br />1. Residential Use Identified in 5th Edition ITE Manual: Single - <br />Family <br />2. For Single -Family Units, in ITE Manual: <br />a. Average Weekday Trip Enda: 9.55/unit <br />b. P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends: 1.01/unit <br />C. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 65% <br />d. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 35% <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.